Ethanol and Isopropanol in Concentrations Present in Hand Sanitizers Sharply Reduce Excystation of Giardia and Entamoeba and Eliminate Oral Infectivity of Giardia Cysts in Gerbils (2024)

Ethanol and Isopropanol in Concentrations Present in Hand Sanitizers Sharply Reduce Excystation of Giardia and Entamoeba and Eliminate Oral Infectivity of Giardia Cysts in Gerbils (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov; 59(11): 6749–6754.

Published online 2015 Oct 13. Prepublished online 2015 Aug 17. doi:10.1128/AAC.01290-15

PMCID: PMC4604385

PMID: 26282413

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Abstract

Enteric protozoan parasites, which are spread by the fecal-oral route, are important causes of diarrhea (Giardia duodenalis) and amebic dysentery (Entamoeba histolytica). Cyst walls of Giardia and Entamoeba have a single layer composed of fibrils of β-1,3-linked GalNAc and β-1,4-linked GlcNAc (chitin), respectively. The goal here was to determine whether hand sanitizers that contain ethanol or isopropanol as the active microbicide might reduce transmission of these parasites. We found that treatment with these alcohols with or without drying in a rotary evaporator (to model rapid evaporation of sanitizers on hands) kills 85 to 100% of cysts of G. duodenalis and 90 to 100% of cysts of Entamoeba invadens (a nonpathogenic model for E. histolytica), as shown by nuclear labeling with propidium iodide and failure to excyst in vitro. Alcohols with or without drying collapsed the cyst walls of Giardia but did not collapse the cyst walls of Entamoeba. To validate the in vitro results, we showed that treatment with alcohols eliminated oral infection of gerbils by 1,000 G. duodenalis cysts, while a commercial hand sanitizer (Purell) killed E. invadens cysts that were directly applied to the hands. These results suggest that expanded use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers might reduce the transmission of Giardia and Entamoeba.

INTRODUCTION

Giardia duodenalis (also known as Giardia lamblia) is an important cause of human diarrhea in both the developing and developed world and is an important zoonosis of companion and production animals (1,8). Entamoeba histolytica may cause amebic dysentery and liver abscess, primarily in the developing world (9,11). Because these parasites may cause severe infections and are readily transmitted by asymptomatic carriers, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has designated Giardia and Entamoeba category B priority pathogens.

Our laboratory has extensively characterized the cyst walls of Giardia and Entamoeba, each of which contains a prominent sugar polymer and a small set of proteins (12, 13). In contrast, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall contains two sugar polymers (chitin and β-1,3-linked glucan) and ∼100 glycoproteins (14). The Giardia cyst wall contains curled fibrils of β-1,3-linked N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) and cyst wall proteins (CWPs) that bind the GalNAc hom*opolymer (15, 16). Cyst wall proteins have very short Asn-linked glycans composed of two GlcNAc residues (17). While cytosolic proteins of Giardia may contain GlcNAc linked to Ser or Thr residues, no O-linked glycans have been identified in its secreted or cyst wall proteins (18).

The Entamoeba cyst wall is modeled by Entamoeba invadens, which infects reptiles but not humans, because E. histolytica does not encyst in axenic culture or in the mouse model. The Entamoeba cyst wall is composed of fibrils of β-1,4-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) (chitin), which are labeled by wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) (19, 20). Entamoeba cyst walls contain three abundant chitin-binding glycoproteins (lectins) that cross-link chitin, degrade chitin, or self-aggregate (21). These glycoproteins contain N-glycans that are longer than those of Giardia but shorter than those of the host. Cyst wall glycoproteins also contain unique O-phosphodiester-linked glycans (22). When cysts of Giardia or Entamoeba are placed in excystation media that mirror conditions in the small intestines, trophozoites (the motile, colonizing form) are released (23, 24).

We are interested in alcohol-based hand sanitation methods to reduce transmission of Giardia and Entamoeba, because these sanitizers, which were identified >100 years ago, are effective against many viral, bacterial, and fungal infections; alcohol-based sanitizers are relatively inexpensive and do not depend upon scarce supplies of clean water; and there are no human vaccines for Giardia and Entamoeba (25,32). Hand sanitizers contain 63% to 80% ethanol or isopropanol. They kill microorganisms by penetrating walls, disrupting membranes, and denaturing proteins. Here, we show that alcohol treatment blocks excystation of G. duodenalis and E. invadens in vitro and blocks oral infection of gerbils by G. duodenalis cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Giardia duodenalis.

Cysts of the H3 strain of G. duodenalis (assemblage B), which are produced in gerbils, were purchased from Waterborne, Inc. (New Orleans, LA). The cysts (1,000 cysts/200 μl) were incubated with occasional shaking in water, 63% ethanol, 80% ethanol, 63% isopropanol, or 80% isopropanol for 5 min at room temperature (∼21°C) with or without drying in a rotary evaporator (Savant SpeedVac SC110A Plus concentrator; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 5 min. These times, which are longer than those used to wash hands with alcohol-based hand sanitizers, allowed us to process multiple samples as a group and so avoid the variability that might occur when samples were processed sequentially. WHO formulations for hand sanitizers are available online (http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/Guide_to_Local_Production.pdf). Cyst walls were labeled for 1 h at room temperature with an anti-CWP1 monoclonal antibody (MAb) (Waterborne Inc., New Orleans, LA), which was diluted 1:500 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (16). After washing three times in PBS, the cysts were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (0.2 μg/ml) and/or propidium iodide (PI) (0.2 μg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature and then washed twice in PBS. DAPI is a vital stain that penetrates membranes and binds nuclei, although it may be excluded by cyst walls. PI, which is often included in LIVE/DEAD kits, cannot penetrate intact membranes and so labels only nuclei of dead cells. Cysts and trophozoites were visualized with a DeltaVision deconvoluting microscope (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA). Images were taken with a 100× objective and deconvolved using Applied Precision's softWoRx software (16).

G. duodenalis excystation was induced by incubating cysts in excystation medium containing 1 mg/ml chymotrypsin in Tyrode salt solution for 30 min at 37°C (23). Excystation rates were determined by counting intact versus excysted walls with a Labophot phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Instruments, Inc., Melville, NY) using a 20× objective. In each experiment, 100-μl aliquots that contained ∼100 cysts were counted for each sample, and the experiments were performed at least 3 times each. The rate of excystation for each alcohol treatment was compared with that of cysts incubated in water using an unpaired t test (GraphPad Prism software). Similarly, the rate of excystation for each alcohol treatment plus drying with the rotary evaporator was compared with that of cysts incubated in water and then dried. No statistical comparisons were made between groups treated with different alcohols. Excysted Giardia trophozoites were cultured in TYI-S-33 medium at 37°C to confirm their viability (33).

Four- to 6-week-old female gerbils (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA), none of which were infected with Giardia, were experimentally infected by oral gavage with 1,000 G. duodenalis strain H3 cysts in 100 μl water (34). The cysts were untreated, incubated in 63% or 80% ethanol and dried, or incubated in 80% isopropanol and dried. After 7 days of infection, the gerbils were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation, and the duodenum was removed, minced, and incubated in 1 ml TYI-S-33 medium for 60 min to release Giardia trophozoites, which were counted with phase microscopy and a hemocytometer. Three aliquots from each animal were counted with a hemocytometer. Four animals were in each experimental group, and the experiments were performed two times each. The averages and standard deviations for 8 animals in each group are presented in Fig. 1I. No statistical test was used, as we were unable to identify any Giardia organisms in the lumen of the duodenum in gerbils infected with cysts treated with ethanols or isopropanol.

Ethanol and Isopropanol in Concentrations Present in Hand Sanitizers Sharply Reduce Excystation of Giardia and Entamoeba and Eliminate Oral Infectivity of Giardia Cysts in Gerbils (3)

Ethanol and isopropanol collapse cyst walls of G. duodenalis, permeabilize membranes of trophozoites within cysts, dramatically reduce excystation in vitro, and block oral infection of gerbils. (A) Protocols for testing the effects of ethanol on cysts of G. duodenalis. (B and C) The vital stain DAPI (blue), but not PI (“DEAD” stain) (red), labels nuclei of some cysts (B), but not others (C), in water. Note that drying after incubation in water has no effect on viability. Cyst walls were labeled green with an anti-CWP1 monoclonal antibody. (D to G) After treatment with 63% ethanol (D), 80% ethanol (E), 63% isopropanol (F), or 80% isopropanol plus drying (G), nuclei of G. duodenalis cysts were labeled with PI and walls appeared to collapse. (H and I) Alcohol treatments reduced excystation (H) and blocked oral infection of gerbils with G. duodenalis cysts (I). (H) Excystation plot showing averages and standard errors from at least 3 experiments with hundreds of cysts counted per experiment. In each case, the P values were <0.001 when excystation rates for ethanol (Eth) treatments versus water or for ethanol treatments plus drying versus water plus drying were compared. Iso, isopropanol. (I) Gerbil infections showing averages and standard errors from eight gerbils per treatment (performed in two separate experiments). Because we were unable to recover any Giardia organisms from gerbils infected with alcohol-treated cysts, no statistical analysis was performed.

The manipulation of G. duodenalis cysts was approved by the Boston University Institutional Biosafety Committee. Infecting gerbils with G. duodenalis cysts was approved by the Boston University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Entamoeba invadens.

The IP-2 strain of E. invadens was cultured in TYI-SS medium at room temperature, and trophozoites (105/ml) were induced to encyst by transfer to medium with reduced glucose, osmolarity, and serum for 72 h (20, 33, 35). After encystation, the cysts were suspended in sterile water and left at 4°C for 6 h to lyse trophozoites. E. invadens cysts were treated with alcohols, and then DAPI and PI labeling of the cysts were performed as described for Giardia, except cyst walls were labeled with 10 μg/ml WGA, which binds to chitin fibrils (21). E. invadens excystation rates were determined by incubating 104 cysts in 10 ml of excystation medium containing 40 mM sodium bicarbonate and 1.25 mM taurodeoxycholate for 24 h at room temperature and counting intact versus excysted walls with the phase microscope (24). Alternatively, ∼107E. invadens cysts in 1 ml of water were applied with a pipette to the index and pointer fingers of one hand, and hands were washed to dryness (∼2 min) with 1 to 2 ml of a commercial hand sanitizer (Purell; Gojo Industries, Akron, OH). Purell contains 70% ethanol. Residual cysts were eluted with 300 ml of water; concentrated to 1 ml by centrifugation; and labeled with PI, DAPI, and WGA, as described above. The numbers of live cysts (with DAPI staining but no PI staining) and dead cysts (with PI-stained nuclei or walls torn apart) recovered from the hands were compared to those of untreated E. invadens cysts. Hands were extensively washed with soap and water, and all wash solutions were decontaminated with Wescodyne germicidal detergent (Steris, Mentor, OH).

RESULTS

Ethanol and isopropanol permeabilize membranes of G. duodenalis trophozoites within cysts, collapse cyst walls, dramatically reduce excystation in vitro, and block oral infection of gerbils.

The protocol for testing the effects of alcohols on the infectivity of Giardia cysts is shown in Fig. 1A. All G. duodenalis cysts, regardless of experimental treatment, labeled with a MAb to the most abundant cyst wall protein (CWP1) (Fig. 1B). In contrast, only ∼20% of G. duodenalis cysts, which were washed in PBS and incubated in water, labeled with DAPI, a nuclear stain that penetrates membranes. This result shows that the intact cyst wall is relatively impermeable to small molecules, as the formula weight of DAPI is ∼227 and DAPI readily penetrates intact plasma membranes of live trophozoites (data not shown). Zero to 5% of these cysts labeled with PI (the “DEAD” stain in LIVE/DEAD kits), depending upon the batch of commercially obtained cysts (Fig. 1B). Cysts that had been incubated in water remained viable (they might label with DAPI but not with PI) after being quickly dried with the rotary evaporator (Fig. 1C). In contrast, drying overnight in the cold decreased the viability of G. duodenum cysts (36).

After treatment for 5 min with ethanol or isopropanol, nuclei of >95% of G. duodenalis trophozoites within cysts label with PI, indicating that the trophozoites within are dead (Fig. 1D to toG).G). Staining with the anti-CWP1 MAb shows that cyst walls are often collapsed by incubation with ethanols. Drying in the rotary evaporator modestly improved killing. Supporting the idea that alcohols kill G. duodenalis cysts, ethanol or isopropanol treatment with or without drying dramatically reduces excystation in vitro to 0 to 15% of parasites examined (Fig. 1H). The effect of each alcohol treatment on excystation was highly significant (P < 0.001) compared with treatment in water. No statistical comparison was made between the alcohol treatments, as they all worked well to block excystation. Excysted parasites are viable, as shown by their motility and by their growth in culture. Consistent with the absence of PI labeling of their nuclei (Fig. 1C), drying of water-treated cysts in the rotary evaporator did not prevent excystation.

Treatment of 1,000 Giardia cysts with 63% and 80% ethanol or 80% isopropanol, all with drying in the rotary evaporator, completely prevents gerbil infection by oral gavage, which was determined by counting trophozoites in the duodenal lumen after 1 week of infection (Fig. 1I) (34). Eight of 8 gerbils were infected with untreated cysts, and we recovered >107G. duodenalis trophozoites (average) from their duodenums. In contrast, we were unable to recover any trophozoites from 24 of 24 gerbils infected with alcohol-treated cysts (the lowest detection limit with the hemocytometer was 104 parasites/ml).

Alcohols in the test tube and on the hands kill E. invadens cysts, as shown by PI staining, disruption of cyst walls, and/or reduced rates of excystation.

The protocols for testing the effects of alcohols on the infectivity of Entamoeba cysts are shown in Fig. 2A and andG.G. All the control E. invadens cysts in water labeled with WGA (chitin in the wall) and DAPI but did not label with PI (Fig. 2B). Treatment of E. invadens cysts with ethanol or isopropanol makes the cysts permeable to PI (Fig. 2C to toE).E). While dehydration with alcohols collapses G. duodenalis cyst walls (Fig. 1D to toG),G), alcohol treatment and drying do not collapse the cyst wall of E. invadens. Alcohol treatment with or without drying with the rotary evaporator blocks excystation in vitro of E. invadens cysts (Fig. 2F). Again, the difference between the excystation rates of alcohol-treated organisms and that of cysts incubated in water was highly significant (P < 0.001). As described for G. lamblia cysts, drying of water-treated E. invadens cysts in the rotary evaporator did not prevent excystation.

Ethanol and Isopropanol in Concentrations Present in Hand Sanitizers Sharply Reduce Excystation of Giardia and Entamoeba and Eliminate Oral Infectivity of Giardia Cysts in Gerbils (4)

Alcohols in the test tube and on the hands kill E. invadens cysts, as shown by PI staining, reduced rates of excystation, and/or disruption of cyst walls. (A) Protocol for testing the effects of ethanol-based hand sanitizers on E. invadens cysts in the test tube. (B) DAPI (blue), but not PI (red), labels nuclei of control cysts in water. (C to E) Cyst walls were stained green with WGA, which binds to chitin fibrils. After treatment with 80% ethanol (C), 63% isopropanol (D), or 80% isopropanol (E), nuclei of E. invadens cysts were labeled with PI, indicating the trophozoites within were dead. (E) Drying with the rotary evaporator caused some E. invadens cysts to form large aggregates. (F) Treatment of cysts in the test tube with ethanol or isopropanol with or without drying with the rotary evaporator dramatically reduced excystation in vitro. (G) Protocol for testing the effect of a commercial hand sanitizer (Purell) on E. invadens applied directly to the hands. (H and I) Purell killed E. invadens cysts that were directly applied to the hands, as shown by PI labeling (H) or by disruption of the cyst walls (I). Heavy contamination with squamous epithelial cells and bacteria made it impossible to judge excystation, so >500 PI-, DAPI-, and WGA-labeled cysts were examined in three separate experiments with Purell. In no case were we able to identify any intact cysts, as defined by DAPI and WGA labeling and failure to label with PI (as in panel B).

When E. invadens cysts, which are not infectious to people, are applied to the index and pointer fingers and the hands are cleaned with a commercial hand sanitizer (Purell), the cysts are killed, as shown by PI staining of nuclei (Fig. 2H). In addition, cyst walls, which are heavily contaminated with squamous epithelial cells and bacteria, are frequently disrupted (Fig. 2I). Because of this heavy contamination, we did not perform excystation experiments but instead counted >500 Purell-treated cysts (total) in three separate experiments. All of these cysts appeared dead (they were labeled with PI and/or had disrupted walls), and none appeared alive (i.e., labeled with DAPI but not PI and had intact walls).

DISCUSSION

Arguments for using alcohol-based hand sanitizers to reduce the spread of Giardia and Entamoeba.

As shown by the labeling of the nuclei of alcohol-treated cysts with PI, alcohols penetrate cyst walls and disrupt plasma membranes of trophozoites of G. duodenalis and E. invadens that are inside (Fig. 1 and and2).2). Alcohols dramatically reduce excystation of both parasites and block gerbil infections with 1,000 G. duodenalis cysts, which is well above the minimal infectious dose (34). As the vast majority of Giardia and Entamoeba organisms were killed by alcohols without drying, the effect of the rotary evaporator was minimal. The effect of alcohol treatment on G. duodenalis infections is much greater than that of oral consumption of whole wheat and/or wheat germ, which contain WGA and are common components of the human diet. In a rodent model and in human infections, WGA, which binds to short N-glycans of G. duodenalis and reduces excystation in vitro, showed modest reduction in cysts shed and in symptoms (humans) (37,39). A commercial alcohol-based hand sanitizer killed E. invadens cysts directly applied to the hands, validating the findings when E. invadens cysts were treated with alcohols in a microcentrifuge tube and dried in the rotary evaporator.

The alcohol-based hand sanitizers are safe, relatively inexpensive, and well tolerated; they do not need water; they do not select for antibiotic-resistant organisms; they also reduce infections with viruses, bacteria, and fungi; and they are packaged in small volumes that are stable at room temperature and so can be used by travelers (25,32, 40). While hand washing with soap and water will also reduce diarrhea caused by Giardia and Entamoeba, as well as other parasites, bacteria, and viruses, this solution is unavailable to hundreds of millions of people who lack access to abundant clean water (41,43).

There is presently no human vaccine for Giardia or Entamoeba. While drugs to treat Giardia (albendazole and metronidazole) and Entamoeba (metronidazole) are inexpensive and efficacious, the broader public health goal is to prevent infections by whatever reasonable means are available (44). This is not to diminish the appropriate excitement about new anti-Giardia drugs that (i) overcome antibiotic resistance (e.g., derivatives of nitroimidazoles and benzimidazoles), (ii) have already been approved for other indications (e.g., auranofin), or (iii) target enzymes essential to parasite viability that are absent from the host (e.g., arginine deaminase) (reviewed in reference 45).

Finding drugs that inhibit cyst formation, which might break the life cycle of each parasite, faces three difficulties (46). First, trophozoites are the dividing forms that cause diarrhea (Giardia) or dysentery (Entamoeba), so inhibition of wall formation would temporarily stop shedding of infectious cysts but would not clear the primary infections. Second, the search for chitin synthase inhibitors to treat fungal infections has produced candidate compounds (e.g., nikkomycin Z), none of which is in clinical use (47). It is therefore unlikely that an inhibitor for the Entamoeba chitin synthase will be easily found, and the synthase that makes the GalNAc polymer in Giardia cyst walls has not been molecularly characterized (15). Third, because Giardia is a zoonotic infection, inhibitors of cyst wall formation would also need to treat animal reservoirs, which are most likely not household pets but are likely infected production animals (6,8).

Caveats.

Only a few alcohol-based hand sanitation solutions were modeled here, so there are likely hand sanitizers with additional ingredients (e.g., detergents, organic acids, or quaternary ammonium compounds) that might be even more effective or last longer after washing. Because we were handling sets of parasites, organisms were treated with alcohol for 5 min and dried for 5 min, which is longer than it takes to use hand sanitizers. G. duodenalis cysts were not directly applied to the hands and washed with alcohol-based sanitizers. E. invadens was used to model E. histolytica cysts, and we did not validate alcohol treatments in an animal model (infecting reptiles with E. invadens cysts is beyond our capabilities).

While these hand-sanitizing solutions might reduce food contamination by infected handlers, they would not be expected to reduce waterborne infections with cysts of Giardia or Entamoeba (1, 30). Hand washing or use of hand sanitizers is uneven at best in day care centers and homes in developed countries and is likely sporadic in developing countries (2,5, 26, 28,32). The role of alcohol-based hand sanitizers in schools, day care centers, and homes in developed countries, where water is plentiful for washing hands with antimicrobial soaps, is unclear (30, 32). The dermatologic effects of alcohols (e.g., dryness) may reduce their routine use to prevent infections with Giardia and Entamoeba (48). Finally, because hand sanitizers cost more than soap and water, their use would likely need to be subsidized and targeted (e.g., to mothers or caregivers of infants).

Despite these caveats, it appears that expanded use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, which rapidly kill cysts, has a reasonable chance of reducing transmission of Giardia and Entamoeba.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by NIH grant AI048082.

REFERENCES

1. Baldursson S, Karanis P. 2011. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks—an update 2004-2010. Water Res45:6603–6614. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, Wu Y, Sow SO, Sur D, Breiman RF, Faruque AS, Zaidi AK, Saha D, Alonso PL, Tamboura B, Sanogo D, Onwuchekwa U, Manna B, Ramamurthy T, Kanungo S, Ochieng JB, Omore R, Oundo JO, Hossain A, Das SK, Ahmed S, Qureshi S, Quadri F, Adegbola RA, Antonio M, Hossain MJ, Akinsola A, Mandomando I, Nhampossa T, Acacio S, Biswas K, O'Reilly CE, Mintz ED, Berkeley LY, Muhsen K, Sommerfelt H, Robins-Browne RM, Levine MM. 2013. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet382:209–222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60844-2. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Barry MA, Weatherhead JE, Hotez PJ, Woc-Colburn L. 2013. Childhood parasitic infections endemic to the United States. Pediatr Clin North Am60:471–485. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.12.011. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Fletcher SM, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J. 2012. Enteric protozoa in the developed world: a public health perspective. Clin Microbiol Rev25:420–449. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05038-11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Muhsen K, Levine MM. 2012. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between Giardia lamblia and endemic pediatric diarrhea in developing countries. Clin Infect Dis55:S271–S293. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis762. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Thompson RC.2013. Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: One Health, spillover and human activity. Int J Parasitol43:1079–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Ryan U, Cacciò SM. 2013. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. Int J Parasitol43:943–956. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Feng Y, Xiao L. 2011. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev24:110–140. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Ximénez C, Morán P, Rojas L, Valadez A, Gómez A. 2009. Reassessment of the epidemiology of amebiasis: state of the art. Infect Genet Evol9:1023–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.06.008. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Taniuchi M, Sobuz SU, Begum S, Platts-Mills JA, Liu J, Yang Z, Wang XQ, Petri WA Jr, Haque R, Houpt ER. 2013. Etiology of diarrhea in Bangladeshi infants in the first year of life analyzed using molecular methods. J Infect Dis208:1794–1802. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Faust DM, Guillen N. 2012. Virulence and virulence factors in Entamoeba histolytica, the agent of human amoebiasis. Microbes Infect14:1428–1441. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.05.013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Samuelson J, Robbins P. 2011. A simple fibril and lectin model for cyst walls of Entamoeba and perhaps Giardia. Trends Parasitol27:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2010.09.002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Samuelson J, Bushkin GG, Chatterjee A, Robbins PW. 2013. Strategies to discover the structural components of cyst and oocyst walls. Eukaryot Cell12:1578–1587. doi: 10.1128/EC.00213-13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Lesage G, Bussey H. 2006. Cell wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev70:317–343. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00038-05. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Gerwig GJ, van Kuik JA, Leeflang BR, Kamerling JP, Vliegenthart JF, Karr CD, Jarroll EL. 2002. The Giardia intestinalis filamentous cyst wall contains a novel beta (1-3)-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine polymer: a structural and conformational study. Glycobiology12:499–505. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwf059. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Chatterjee A, Carpentieri A, Ratner DM, Bullitt E, Costello CE, Robbins PW, Samuelson J. 2010. Giardia cyst wall protein 1 is a lectin that binds curled fibrils of the GalNAc hom*opolymer. PLoS Pathog6:e1001059. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001059. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Ratner DM, Cui J, Steffen M, Moore LL, Robbins PW, Samuelson J. 2008. Changes in the N-glycome, glycoproteins with Asn-linked glycans, of Giardia lamblia with differentiation from trophozoites to cysts. Eukaryot Cell7:1930–1940. doi: 10.1128/EC.00268-08. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Banerjee S, Robbins PW, Samuelson J. 2009. Molecular characterization of nucleocytosolic O-GlcNAc transferases of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum. Glycobiology19:331–336. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwn107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Arroyo-Begovich A, Cárabez-Trejo A, Ruíz-Herrera J. 1980. Identification of the structural component in the cyst wall of Entamoeba invadens. J Parasitol66:735–741. doi: 10.2307/3280662. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Chatterjee A, Ghosh SK, Jang K, Bullitt E, Moore LL, Robbins PW, Samuelson J. 2009. Evidence for a “wattle and daub” model of the cyst wall of Entamoeba. PLoS Pathog5:e1000498. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Frisardi M, Ghosh SK, Field J, Van Dellen K, Rogers R, Robbins P, Samuelson J. 2000. The most abundant glycoprotein of cyst walls (Jacob) is a lectin with five Cys-rich, chitin-binding domains. Infect Immun68:4217–4224. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.7.4217-4224.2000. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Van Dellen K, Van Dellen KL, Chatterjee A, Ratner DM, Magnelli PE, Cipollo J, Steffen M, Robbins PW, Samuelson J. 2006. Unique posttranslational modifications of chitin-binding lectins of Entamoeba invadens cyst walls. Eukaryot Cell5:836–848. doi: 10.1128/EC.5.5.836-848.2006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Boucher SE, Gillin FD. 1990. Excystation of in vitro-derived Giardia lamblia cysts. Infect Immun58:3516–3522. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Mitra BN, Pradel G, Frevert U, Eichinger D. 2010. Compounds of the upper gastrointestinal tract induce rapid and efficient excystation of Entamoeba invadens. Int J Parasitol40:751–760. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.11.012. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Harrington C, Walker H. 1903. The germicidal action of alcohol. Boston Med Surg J148:548–552. doi: 10.1056/NEJM190305211482102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Boyce J, World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety First Global Patient Safety Challenge Core Group of Experts. 2009. The World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene in health care and their consensus recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol30:611–622. doi: 10.1086/600379. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Fendler E, Groziak P. 2002. Efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizers against fungi and viruses. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol23:61–62. doi: 10.1086/503455. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Bloomfield SF, Aiello AE, Cookson B, O'Boyle C, Larson EL. 2007. The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks of infections in home and community settings including handwashing and alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Am J Infect Control35:S27–S64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Zomer TP, Erasmus V, van Beeck EF, Tjon A, Tsien A, Richardus JH, Voeten HA. 2013. Hand hygiene compliance and environmental determinants in child day care centers: an observational study. Am J Infect Control41:497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.06.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Todd EC, Michaels BS, Holah J, Smith D, Greig JD, Bartleson CA. 2010. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 10. Alcohol-based antiseptics for hand disinfection and a comparison of their effectiveness with soaps. J Food Prot73:2128–2140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Prazuck T, Compte-Nguyen G, Pelat C, Sunder S, Blanchon T. 2010. Reducing gastroenteritis occurrences and their consequences in elementary schools with alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Pediatr Infect Dis J29:994–998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Luby SP, Kadir MA, Yushuf Sharker MA, Yeasmin F, Unicomb L, Sirajul Islam M. 2010. A community-randomised controlled trial promoting waterless hand sanitizer and handwashing with soap, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Trop Med Int Health15:1508–1516. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02648.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Clark CG, Diamond LS. 2002. Methods for cultivation of luminal parasitic protists of clinical importance. Clin Microbiol Rev15:329–341. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.3.329-341.2002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Belosevic M, Faubert GM, MacLean JD, Law C, Croll NA. 1983. Giardia lamblia infections in Mongolian gerbils: an animal model. J Infect Dis147:222–226. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.2.222. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Sanchez L, Enea V, Eichinger D. 1994. Identification of a developmentally regulated transcript expressed during encystation of Entamoebainvadens. Mol Biochem Parasitol67:125–135. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(94)90102-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Bingham AK, Jarroll EL Jr, Meyer EA, Radulescu S. 1979. Giardia sp.: physical factors of excystation in vitro, and excystation vs eosin exclusion as determinants of viability. Exp Parasitol47:284–291. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(79)90080-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Meng TC, Hetsko ML, Gillin FD. 1996. Inhibition of Giardia lamblia excystation by antibodies against cyst walls and by wheat germ agglutinin. Infect Immun64:2151–2157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Ortega-Barria E, Ward HD, Keusch GT, Pereira ME. 1994. Growth inhibition of the intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia by a dietary lectin is associated with arrest of the cell cycle. J Clin Invest94:2283–2288. doi: 10.1172/JCI117591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Grant J, Mahanty S, Khadir A, MacLean JD, Kokoskin E, Yeager B, Joseph L, Diaz J, Gotuzzo E, Mainville N, Ward BJ. 2001. Wheat germ supplement reduces cyst and trophozoite passage in people with giardiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg65:705–710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Henriey D, Delmont J, Gautret P. 2014. Does the use of alcohol-based hand gel sanitizer reduce travellers' diarrhea and gastrointestinal upset? A preliminary survey. Travel Med Infect Dis12:494–498. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.07.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. UNICEF WHO.2009. Diarrhoea: why children are still dying and what can be done. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]

42. Fewtrell L, Kaufmann RB, Kay D, Enanoria W, Haller L, Colford JM Jr. 2005. Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis5:42–52. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01253-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. WHO, UN-Water. 2014. Global analysis and assessment of sanitation and drinking water (GLAAS). World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]

44. Solaymani-Mohammadi S, Genkinger JM, Loffredo CA, Singer SM. 2010. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of albendazole compared with metronidazole as treatments for infections with Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis4:e682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000682. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

45. Watkins RR, Eckmann L. 2014. Treatment of giardiasis: current status and future directions. Curr Infect Dis Rep16:396. doi: 10.1007/s11908-014-0396-y. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. Aguilar-Díaz H, Carrero JC, Argüello-García R, Laclette JP, Morales-Montor J. 2011. Cyst and encystment in protozoan parasites: optimal targets for new life-cycle interrupting strategies?Trends Parasitol27:450–458. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2011.06.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Chaudhary PM, Tupe SG, Deshpande MV. 2013. Chitin synthase inhibitors as antifungal agents. Mini Rev Med Chem13:222–236. doi: 10.2174/1389557511313020005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Kampf G, Löffler H. 2003. Dermatological aspects of a successful introduction and continuation of alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect55:1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00223-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

Ethanol and Isopropanol in Concentrations Present in Hand Sanitizers Sharply Reduce Excystation of Giardia and Entamoeba and Eliminate Oral Infectivity of Giardia Cysts in Gerbils (2024)

FAQs

Is Giardia killed by hand sanitizer? ›

When soap and water aren't available, you can use alcohol-based sanitizers. However, alcohol-based sanitizers aren't effective in destroying the cyst form of giardia that survives in the environment.

What disinfectant kills Giardia? ›

Some patients may require medical treatment for 4-8 weeks or until the infestation is cleared. For this reason, many steps are taken to control environmental contamination and limit the possibility for ongoing re-exposure/infestation. The most readily available disinfectant is bleach diluted 1:32 in water.

Can you mix ethanol and isopropyl alcohol? ›

You can use either separately, or it's ok to mix the two as long as your final product is 70% combined alcohol and 30% water.

Which sanitizer is best ethanol or isopropyl alcohol? ›

Isopropyl alcohol is effective against viruses such as FCV at 40% – 60% concentrations. Ethanol however, is more effective at 70% – 90% concentrations against FCV. Contact time indicates how effective an alcohol is against a target microbe in a given period of time.

How do you disinfect Giardia cysts? ›

Common household disinfectants and steam-cleaning are the most effective ways for killing Giardia cysts. Remove and dispose of all feces promptly. Giardia cysts on the lawn can only be killed by direct sunlight drying them.

Is Giardia hard to get rid of? ›

Since Giardia is also difficult to eliminate from your home or yard, and dogs develop no immunity after being infected, reinfection with the parasite is endlessly possible.

What ingredient kills Giardia? ›

Of the nitroimidazoles, the mechanism of killing of Giardia by metronidazole has been the most thoroughly studied.

What detergent kills Giardia? ›

Using either a cleaner containing a “quaternary ammonium compound” otherwise known as QATS or listed as alkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, or a solution of bleach mixed with water in a ratio of ¾ cup of bleach to one gallon of water, leave the solution on the surface for ten minutes or the amount listed on the cleaner's ...

Can you get rid of Giardia naturally? ›

In many cases when someone acquires a giardia infection it will clear up on its own, typically within several weeks as the digestive system and immune systems remove the parasite from the body. However, in severe cases the body may not be able to control the infection.

How much isopropyl is toxic to humans? ›

EFFECTS ON HUMANS

The lethal dose of isopropyl alcohol is estimated as 160-240 ml (Ashkar and Miller, 1971) and 250 ml (McBay, 1973).

What is the difference between isopropanol and ethanol? ›

Isopropyl alcohol is generally safer than ethanol unless you spill large amounts of it on your skin, which can result in itching, cracking and redness. Ethanol is more dehydrating and causes skin discomfort whereas isopropyl alcohol evaporates faster.

Is 70% alcohol hand sanitizer better than 90%? ›

Basically, a 90 or 91 percent alcohol solution is too powerful in some cases: It fries the outside of the cell before it can get into the inside and kill the actual germ. 70 percent alcohol is just the right proportion of water and alcohol to zap the entire cell.

Is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than pure alcohol? ›

70% isopropyl alcohol is by far better at killing bacteria and viruses than 99% isopropyl alcohol. As a disinfectant, 70% concentration of alcohol is the most effective at killing pathogens. Any higher or lower percentage will be less effective.

Can I use 70% isopropyl alcohol as hand sanitizer? ›

Even though you may think the higher concentration is more effective, experts say 70% is actually better for disinfecting. It has more water, which helps it to dissolve more slowly, penetrate cells, and kill bacteria. The disinfecting power of rubbing alcohol drops at concentrations higher than 80%-85%.

What kills Giardia besides bleach? ›

Boiling drinking water for at least 10 minutes at a hard boil. Adding five drops of tincture of iodine to a quart of water and waiting 30 minutes. Iodine is much more effective in eliminating Giardia than chlorine-based (bleach) treatments. Using a high-quality water filtration system.

Can Lysol help with Giardia? ›

For environmental disinfection, you can use chlorine bleach at 1:32 or 1:16 dilutions or 1-2 cups in a gallon of water (60-120 ml/L). However, be sure that the affected surfaces can be safely treated with bleach. Lysol® and quaternary ammonium compounds (e.g., Parvosol®) are also reported to kill cysts effectively.

How long will Giardia live on surfaces? ›

How long does Giardia survive in the environment? o In cold temperatures (around 4°C/39.2°F), Giardia can survive for approximately 7 weeks (49 days). o At room temperature (around 25°C/77°F), Giardia can survive for approximately 1 week (7 days).

How long does Giardia bacteria live on surfaces? ›

How long does Giardia survive in the environment? In cold temperatures (around 4ºC/39.2ºF), Giardia can survive for approximately 7 weeks (49 days). At room temperature (around 25ºC/77ºF), Giardia can survive for approximately 1 week (7 days).

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Greg Kuvalis

Last Updated:

Views: 6000

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Greg Kuvalis

Birthday: 1996-12-20

Address: 53157 Trantow Inlet, Townemouth, FL 92564-0267

Phone: +68218650356656

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Knitting, Amateur radio, Skiing, Running, Mountain biking, Slacklining, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Greg Kuvalis, I am a witty, spotless, beautiful, charming, delightful, thankful, beautiful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.