Types of evaluation (2024)

Many types of evaluation exist, consequently evaluation methods need to be customised according to what is being evaluated and the purpose of the evaluation.1,2 It is important to understand the different types of evaluation that can be conducted over a program’s life-cycle and when they should be used. The main types of evaluation are process, impact, outcome and summative evaluation.1

Before you are able to measure the effectiveness of your project, you need to determine if the project is being run as intended and if it is reaching the intended audience.3 It is futile to try and determine how effective your program is if you are not certain of the objective, structure, programing and audience of the project. This is why process evaluation should be done prior to any other type of evaluation.3

Process evaluation

Process evaluation is used to “measure the activities of the program, program quality and who it is reaching”3 Process evaluation, as outlined by Hawe and colleagues3 will help answer questions about your program such as:

  • Has the project reached the target group?
  • Are all project activities reaching all parts of the target group?
  • Are participants and other key stakeholders satisfied with all aspects of the project?
  • Are all activities being implemented as intended? If not why?
  • What if any changes have been made to intended activities?
  • Are all materials, information and presentations suitable for the target audience?

Impact evaluation

Impact evaluation is used to measure the immediate effect of the program and is aligned with the programs objectives. Impact evaluation measures how well the programs objectives (and sub-objectives) have been achieved.1,3

Impact evaluation will help answer questions such as:

  • How well has the project achieved its objectives (and sub-objectives)?
  • How well have the desired short term changes been achieved?

For example, one of the objectives of the My-Peer project is to provide a safe space and learning environment for young people, without fear of judgment, misunderstanding, harassment or abuse. Impact evaluation will assess the attitudes of young people towards the learning environment and how they perceived it. It may also assess changes in participants’ self esteem, confidence and social connectedness.

Impact evaluation measures the program effectiveness immediate after the completion of the program and up to six months after the completion of the program.

Outcome evaluation

Outcome evaluation is concerned with the long term effects of the program and is generally used to measure the program goal. Consequently, outcome evaluation measures how well the program goal has been achieved.1,3

Outcome evaluation will help answer questions such as:

  • Has the overall program goal been achieved?
  • What, if any factors outside the program have contributed or hindered the desired change?
  • What, if any unintended change has occurred as a result of the program?

In peer-based youth programs outcome evaluation may measure changes to: mental and physical wellbeing, education and employment and help-seeking behaviours.

Outcome evaluation measures changes at least six months after the implementation of the program (longer term). Although outcome evaluation measures the main goal of the program, it can also be used to assess program objectives over time. It should be noted that it is not always possible or appropriate to conduct outcome evaluation in peer-based programs.

Summative evaluation

At the completion of the program it may also be valuable to conduct summative evaluation. This considers the entire program cycle and assists in decisions such as:

  • Do you continue the program?
  • If so, do you continue it in its entirety?
  • Is it possible to implement the program in other settings?
  • How sustainable is the program?
  • What elements could have helped or hindered the program?
  • What recommendations have evolved out of the program?3,4

Types of evaluation (1)References

  1. Nutbeam & Bauman 2006
  2. Trochim 2006
  3. Hawe, P., Degeling, D., Hall, J. (1990) Evaluating Health Promotion: A Health Worker’s Guide, MacLennan & Petty, Sydney.
  4. South Australian Community Health Research Unit n.d.c

I've delI've delved extensivelyI've delved extensively intove delved extensively into programdelved extensively into program evaluation in program evaluation methodologies and strategies, I've engaged extensively in academic research and practical applications within the field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensivees, I've engaged extensively in academic research and practical applications within the field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment and my experience aligns with the intricaciesch and practical applications within the field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of incal applications within the field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs articleons within the field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs acrossns within the field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across variouswithin the field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including healthe field. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, andield. I've worked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development.orked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses arked on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deeped on numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understandingn numerous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluationrous projects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation typesprojects involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types,cts involving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologieslving the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies,ng the comprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, andcomprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and theirprehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementationehensive assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughoute assessment of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout differentt of programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stagesf programs across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages ofgrams across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program across various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program'sross various sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's lifes sectors, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycles, including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

including health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

Theuding health, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The articlealth, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article youth, education, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you'veon, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've providedn, and community development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delommunity development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delvesmmunity development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves intoity development. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into thevelopment. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamentalelopment. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of delt. My expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluationMy expertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation,pertise encompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizingcompasses a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing thes a deep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importancedeep understanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance oferstanding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailding of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoringing of evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluationf evaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methodsaluation types, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods accordingpes, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according toes, methodologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to theologies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature oflogies, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of thees, and their implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the programheir implementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program andementation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and itsmentation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectivesation throughout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives.ghout different stages of a program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let analyzing whethera program's life cycle.

The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's project reaches the The article you've provided delves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break group comprehensivelylves into the fundamental concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down satisfaction levelsntal concepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down theoncepts of program evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the keyogram evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key conceptsgram evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered evaluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered inluation, emphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in theemphasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the articlehasizing the importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

importance of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

1 of tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  1. tailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  2. **ailoring evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  3. **Typesng evaluation methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  4. **Types ofon methods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  5. **Types of Evaluationmethods according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  6. **Types of Evaluation:ds according to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  7. Types of Evaluation: g to the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  8. Types of Evaluation: o the nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  9. Types of Evaluation: -e nature of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  10. Types of Evaluation:

    • **ture of the program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  11. Types of Evaluation:

    • **Processe program and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  12. Types of Evaluation:

    • **Process Evaluationm and its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  13. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation:nd its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  14. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focus its objectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  15. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focusesectives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  16. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses onctives. Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  17. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing break down the key concepts covered in the article:
  18. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing programown the key concepts covered in the article:
  19. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activitieshe key concepts covered in the article:
  20. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities,ey concepts covered in the article:
  21. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality.covered in the article:
  22. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, andered in the article:
  23. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audiencehe article:
  24. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reachrticle:
  25. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach.e:
  26. Types of Evaluation:

    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program's goals haveion:**
    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program*
    • Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation - Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation,- Process Evaluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, theluation: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, andn: Focuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitabilityFocuses on assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability foron assessing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for theing program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intendedng program activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience assess activities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience.ctivities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Processities, their quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluationtheir quality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation isuality, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial asity, and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it and audience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it setsience reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets theence reach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation forreach. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for furtherh. It answers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluationswers critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation typesrs critical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types. ritical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

ical questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

al questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

-questions about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • **s about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • **Impact about program implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • **Impact Evaluationram implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation:implementation, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measurestion, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures then, satisfaction, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediateon, and suitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effectssuitability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects ofability for the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of aor the intended audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a programded audience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program inaudience. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignmentce. Process evaluation is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its changes is crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectivesis crucial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives.ial as it sets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. Itets the foundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assessundation for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement ofn for further evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goalsr evaluation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resultinguation types.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program'sypes.

  • Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation - Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly - Impact Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly aftert Evaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after thevaluation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the programuation: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program andon: Measures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and upeasures the immediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six.

mmediate effects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six monthsOutcomeeffects of a program in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward. :**rogram in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

in alignment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

nment with its objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • **,ts objectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • **Outcomejectives. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • **Outcome Evaluationves. It assesses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation:ses the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concent the achievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentratesachievement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates onvement of short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on longf short-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-termort-term goals and immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and achievementnd immediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures ifimmediate changes resulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the programsulting from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the programg from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's from the program's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals examinesogram's implementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been theementation. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved.on. Impact evaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It achievedaluation measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assessestion measures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factorsures effectiveness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to goaleness shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to ors shortly after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hind after the program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hinderinghe program and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desiredogram and up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changesd up to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes andp to six months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintendedix months afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequencesonths afterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences.fterward.

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at-program

  • Outcome Evaluation: Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least. Itluation:** Concentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least sixoncentrates on long-term effects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months beyond the programfects and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation,cts and measures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing onmeasures if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustainedres if the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changesif the program's overarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

    influenced therarching goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • goals have been achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • ** andbeen achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • **Sum achieved. It assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • **SummIt assesses factors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • **Summativeactors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • **Summative Evaluationors contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation:s contributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conductontributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conductedntributing to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted atuting to or hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the hindering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusionndering desired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion ofdesired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of asired changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a programed changes and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program,hanges and unintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, itunintended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates thentended consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entireded consequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire programequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cyclequences. Outcome evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. evaluation evaluation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. Itation occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aidson occurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids inccurs at least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determiningt least six months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining thesix months after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the programnths after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuationths after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, after program implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, itsrogram implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicram implementation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicabilitytation, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability inon, focusing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in othersing on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settingsng on sustained changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings,ed changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainabilityd changes.

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability,

  • Summative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, andSummative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and providesative Evaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendationsEvaluation: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations basedn: Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on:** Conducted at the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on thet the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program the conclusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program'slusion of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomesn of a program, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

am, it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

2 it evaluates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

2.luates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  1. **ates the entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  2. **Purpose entire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  3. **Purpose ofentire program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  4. **Purpose of Eachre program cycle. It aids in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  5. **Purpose of Each Evaluation Type arisings in determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  6. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type: determining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  7. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type: rmining the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  8. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type: -the program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  9. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • **Processe program's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  10. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • **Process Evaluation's continuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  11. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluationcontinuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  12. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helpstinuation, its replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  13. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensureits replicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  14. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that thereplicability in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  15. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program mentioned in other settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  16. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program isther settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  17. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being settings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  18. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executedtings, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  19. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intendedngs, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  20. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended,, sustainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  21. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reachingstainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  22. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching thetainability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  23. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intendednability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  24. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audienceability, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  25. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, andity, and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  26. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining and provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  27. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining qualitynd provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  28. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout provides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  29. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout itsprovides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  30. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activitiesvides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.
  31. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

ides recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  1. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    recommendations based on the program's outcomes.

  2. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • works in thethe program's outcomes.

  3. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • **Impactogram's outcomes.

  4. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • **Impact Evaluationam's outcomes.

  5. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluationes.

  6. Purpose of Each Evaluation Type:

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measuresose of Each Evaluation Type:**

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures howse of Each Evaluation Type:**

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well, the Haweype:**

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediatepe:**

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have*

    • Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been- Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met Process Evaluation helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met andocess Evaluation** helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assessess Evaluation** helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses Evaluation** helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses shortEvaluation** helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-termvaluation** helps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changeshelps ensure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resultingnsure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting fromure that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from there that the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the programhat the program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program. he program is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

    • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

ram is being executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

    ng executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

    -g executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • **executed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • **Outcomed as intended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • **Outcome Evaluationtended, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluationnded, reaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examinesreaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines theeaching the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the longhing the intended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-termtended audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effectsed audience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects ofudience, and maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of theand maintaining quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall healthing quality throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall programy throughout its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goalt its activities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal hasvities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has beenities.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieveds.

  • Impact Evaluation measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, outlinedct Evaluation** measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors thesetion** measures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintendedures how well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes well the program's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes. rogram's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

ram's immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

    s immediate objectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

    -jectives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • **ives have been met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • **Sumen met and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • **Summmet and assesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • **Summativeesses short-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation-term changes resulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists variousesulting from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making from the program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisionsthe program.

  • Outcome Evaluation examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding including peer-based youthome Evaluation** examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replicationation** examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication,on** examines the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability the long-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability,ong-term effects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, andfects of the program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws andhe program, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendationsgram, aiming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based oniming to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on theng to determine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entiretermine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire programmine if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cyclee if the overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

    overall program goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

Theam goal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The referencesgoal has been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references citedas been achieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited inachieved, considering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in theidering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the articledering external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article,g external factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such asl factors and unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutand unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeamnd unintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam &nintended changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bad changes.

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bauman

  • Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bauman (- Summative Evaluation assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bauman (200mative Evaluation** assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bauman (2006aluation** assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bauman (2006), Troluation** assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bauman (2006), Trochluation** assists in making decisions regarding the program's continuation, replication, sustainability, and draws recommendations based on the entire program cycle.

The references cited in the article, such as Nutbeam & Bauman (2006), Trochim (2006), and Hawe, Degeling, & Hall (1990), provide valuable insights and frameworks for understanding program evaluation methodologies.

Understanding these evaluation types and their purposes is crucial for conducting comprehensive assessments of programs across diverse sectors, ensuring effectiveness, and facilitating informed decision-making for program improvement and sustainability.

Types of evaluation (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Fredrick Kertzmann

Last Updated:

Views: 5765

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Fredrick Kertzmann

Birthday: 2000-04-29

Address: Apt. 203 613 Huels Gateway, Ralphtown, LA 40204

Phone: +2135150832870

Job: Regional Design Producer

Hobby: Nordic skating, Lacemaking, Mountain biking, Rowing, Gardening, Water sports, role-playing games

Introduction: My name is Fredrick Kertzmann, I am a gleaming, encouraging, inexpensive, thankful, tender, quaint, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.