The software testing landscape is constantly changing, and organizations require QA engineers more than ever. Systems integration testing (SIT) and user acceptance testing (UAT) are very important for testing firms as well as for organizations. However, a lot of people confuse the two. This post will help you understand both of these concepts, their differences, and their significance.
Understanding the Basics of SIT vs. UAT
SIT and UAT are two different types of software testing. The development and successful release of any program involve these two tests in separate phases performed by the developing team or by the end user. Both are quite different and require a different set of working rules.
Expand Your Test Coverage
Fast and flexible authoring of AI-powered end-to-end tests — built for scale.
Start Testing Free
Role of the QA Team
Every organization, whether it’s a startup or an enterprise, aims to deliver the best products to its customers. For that, they need a review from the QA engineers. The team reviews the products thoroughly and tests them afterward to get valuable feedback from product owners and customers.
QA and UAT are often confused with each other since they both involve testing. However, they have different objectives. The difference is that QA aims for error-free software whereas UAT ensures that users get the product they want.
QA teams slick the process in such a way that the UAT is more customer friendly. A QA team’s focus on quality can in turn improve the UAT testing and thus deliver a high-quality product.
Understanding System Integration Testing
Let’s break this into parts: system, integration, and testing to understand SIT. A test that checks the integration between different systems is known as system integration testing. A system is not the end product. Various integrations form the end product. For example, e-commerce systems are compiled with payment gateways that receive the order and payments from the customer. There are plenty more examples where various systems comprise the desired end product.
There are different kinds of integrations:
- Hardware-hardware
- Software-software
- Hardware-software.
An e-commerce website using a payment gateway is an example of software-software integration. A car that uses internal sensors is an example of hardware-software integration. Putting different types of physical equipment together is an example of hardware-hardware integration.
Understanding User Acceptance Testing
To understand user acceptance testing, start by thinking of an everyday example where you go to a shop and purchase something you want. After receiving what you asked for from the store employee, you make sure that the order prepared meets your requirements. Similarly, when a user asks developers to create a product, they review it to make sure it matches what they asked for. This process is known as user acceptance testing, sometimes shortened to acceptance testing.
UAT is the last step before the release. There are three basic types: functional acceptance, operational acceptance, and regulatory acceptance.
Does SIT Come Before UAT?
User acceptance testing is the final phase of software testing where the users test the software and decide whether it’s fit for use. If the users are satisfied with the performance of the software, it passes user acceptance testing.
UAT is commonly performed in a production environment. There may or may not be a significant difference in how the software performs in a testing environment and UAT. Therefore, UAT is either performed before or after SIT, depending upon need and applicability.
Learning the Differences Between SIT vs. UAT
How SIT Works
You have already seen what SIT is. Now let’s look at how it works. There are four different steps:
- Integrating the individual units
- Testing the integrating system
- Writing and performing tests according to the system requirements
- Making sure there are no errors
There are two main techniques, a top-down approach, and a bottom-up approach. Also, there is another approach, known as the Big Bang approach.
1. Top-Down Approach
You should have a decent idea about the top-down approach from the name itself. The integration and testing are performed in a top-to-bottom manner. This approach begins with modules integration first, followed by the subsystems and systems. Where the submodules or subsystems are absent, dummy modules known as stubs are used. They have minimal functionality, but you can still use them until the actual module is ready.
Subsystem integrations are generally tricky and thus carry some drawbacks along with them.
2. Bottom-Up Approach
The bottom-up approach is the opposite of the top-down approach. You should first integrate and test the lower modules, followed by the main modules. We refer to the set of lower modules as clusters. Where the main module is not present, drivers are used. Unlike the top-down approach, it is less error-prone.
3. Big Bang Approach
The Big Bang approach in system integration testing is a methodology that involves testing all system components together. This approach is typically used when there is a tight deadline for testing, and all components need to be tested simultaneously. The Big Bang approach can effectively find defects that occur in case of integrated components.
How UAT Works
Here are the working steps for UAT:
- Make a plan based on the requirements
- Prepare test cases and test data according to the requirements
- Test for bugs
- Send the project to production
- Stall production if you find any more bugs at this stage
Types of UAT
There are two types of UAT: alpha testing and beta testing. In alpha testing, customers or users test the product at the development site. In beta testing, customers or users test the product at their sites. Developers have no role here.
Alpha testing is a more controlled environment where the testers better understand the system under test. On the other hand, Beta testing is more of a real-world test, where users are testing the system in their own environment.
Summarizing the Differences
Here’s a summary of these differences:
| SIT | UAT |
| Prefers interfacing between the modules | Focuses entirely on the user’s requirements |
| Follows individual unit testing but before system testing | Follows system testing |
| Developers perform the testing | Customers and end-users perform the testing |
| Issues encountered here can be problems with data flow, control flow, etc. | Issues encountered here tend to be functionality problems, e.g., the program doesn’t work according to the user’s prerequisites. |
Conclusion
We hope you now understand what SIT and UAT are, how to use them, and why they are necessary parts of the software development lifecycle. If you would like to learn more about how you can use software testing to help you achieve your software development goals, or if you want to learn more about best practices for testing software and the right tools, Testim is the right thing for you. Testim is an AI-based testing platform for fast authoring and stable tests used by customers such as Microsoft, NetApp, and Sprinklr. At Testim, our only goal is to make QA testing open, flexible, and customizable so that QA engineers can code or record their tests easily.
What to read next
5 Key Considerations for Evaluating UI and End-to-End Automated Testing Solutions
What Is the Software Testing Life Cycle? A Complete Guide
As an expert in software testing and quality assurance (QA), I bring extensive knowledge and hands-on experience in navigating the dynamic landscape of software testing. My background includes a deep understanding of various testing methodologies, tools, and best practices, making me well-equipped to discuss the concepts introduced in the provided article.
In the constantly evolving world of software development, the role of QA engineers is more crucial than ever. The article discusses two vital types of testing: System Integration Testing (SIT) and User Acceptance Testing (UAT). Let's delve into these concepts and their significance:
-
Role of the QA Team:
- QA engineers play a pivotal role in ensuring the delivery of high-quality products to customers.
- QA and UAT are distinct processes with different objectives; QA aims for error-free software, while UAT ensures that users receive the product they desire.
- The focus on quality by QA teams enhances the customer-friendliness of UAT, leading to the delivery of high-quality products.
-
Understanding System Integration Testing (SIT):
- SIT involves checking the integration between different systems to ensure they work cohesively.
- Systems are not end products; rather, various integrations form the final product.
- Examples include hardware-hardware, software-software, and hardware-software integrations.
- SIT addresses issues related to data flow, control flow, and other integration challenges.
-
Understanding User Acceptance Testing (UAT):
- UAT is the final phase before release, where users test the software to determine its fitness for use.
- Three basic types of UAT are functional acceptance, operational acceptance, and regulatory acceptance.
- UAT can be performed before or after SIT, depending on the specific needs and applicability.
-
How SIT Works:
- SIT involves four main steps: integrating individual units, testing the integrating system, writing and performing tests based on system requirements, and ensuring there are no errors.
- Different techniques, such as top-down, bottom-up, and the Big Bang approach, are employed in SIT.
-
How UAT Works:
- UAT follows a series of steps, including making a plan, preparing test cases and data, testing for bugs, sending the project to production, and halting production if additional bugs are discovered.
- Two types of UAT are alpha testing (at the development site) and beta testing (at user sites).
-
Differences Between SIT and UAT:
- SIT focuses on interfacing between modules and individual unit testing, while UAT concentrates on fulfilling user requirements after system testing.
- Developers typically perform SIT, while customers and end-users are involved in UAT.
- Issues in SIT relate to data flow and control flow, while UAT issues are typically functionality problems according to user prerequisites.
In conclusion, SIT and UAT are indispensable components of the software development lifecycle, each serving a unique purpose in ensuring the delivery of high-quality software products. The article emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts and their differences for effective software testing.
