Selected Alternative Agricultural Financial Benchmarks (2024)

Whole Farm > Financial > Analysis

The information that follows contains rough estimates of the potential revenues and costs for selected alternative agricultural enterprises. The information should not be viewed as the amount of income that would be returned to anyone that was growing or raising the particular product. Management ability, product variety and quality, product yield, marketing outlet, labor efficiency and wage rate, and a host of other factors all play into what an agricultural enterprise would return to any one individual producer. To find a more definitive answer to the potential returns to any agricultural enterprise, it is recommended that an enterprise budget and business plan (including both a financial and marketing plan) be developed. However, if an individual would like to know approximately how much one could earn from a particular enterprise as a first view, then these benchmarks provide the information needed to make initial decisions.

The benchmark data often is listed as a range to take into consideration inherent variability within the enterprise. If one number is listed, view that number as an approximate average. Alternative agricultural enterprise benchmarks included in this publication:

1. Mixed Vegetables – CSA model
2. Mixed Vegetables – Non-CSA model
3. Individual Fruits
4. Organic Row – Crops
5. Pasture Poultry
6. High Tunnels – Mixed Vegetables
7. High Tunnels – Single Crop

1. Mixed Vegetables – CSA model (standards):
Family-size box/week for 20-week season
Share price: $350/share (Urban higher, rural lower)
Number of shares per acre: 50
Gross income/acre: $17,500/acre ($350*50 shares)
FTE/acre: ½ - ¾ person
Labor as a percentage of production costs: 65-75%
Net income ratio: 35% ($6,125/acre at $17,500 gross)
Equipment needs: 35-60 hp tractor for 4-15 acres; rototiller (or borrow) and by hand for 2 acres or less

Notes:
To attain $30,000 net farm income – approximately 5 acres at $6,125 net. For a CSA, this would be 250 share boxes. Labor force would likely be two full-time (include owners) and two to three seasonal employees. Net income would be less the more deliveries per week and the longer the distance to drop-off sites. Total capital outlay should be somewhere around $100,000: $40,000 for land (5 acres @ $8,000), $20,000 tractor, $5,000 for miscellaneous implements (mulch layer and transplanter are common), $10,000 for miscellaneous tools, seeders, etc., $25,000 for shed and/or packing station. Total $100,000.

2. Mixed Vegetables – Non-CSA model (standards):
6-10 different vegetables for 20-week season
Gross income per acre:

  • Direct to consumer sales – (organically certified) - $20,000 - $22,000
  • Direct to consumer sales – (non-organically certified) - $16,000 - $18,000
  • Institutional sales – (food cooperatives, restaurants) - $12,000 - $14,000
  • Institutional sales – (universities, hospitals, care centers) - $10,000 - $12,000
  • Institutional sales – (mainstream grocers, K-12 schools) - $8,000 - $10,000
  • Wholesale sales – (via a food broker or other intermediary) - $6,000 - $8,000

FTE/acre: ½ – ¾ person
Labor as a percentage of production costs: 65-75%
Net income ratio: 35%
Equipment needs: 35-60 hp tractor for 4-15 acres; rototiller (or borrow) and by hand for 2 acres or less; miscellaneous implements (mulch layer, transplanter, etc.)

Notes:
The gross income ranges could be higher or lower depending upon the mix of the products sold and the exact combination of markets. Typically, mixed vegetable farms would have three to five different buyers to not rely primarily on one market/buyer. The net income ratio probably varies somewhat between the higher and lower end of the range of gross income. However, marketing costs decrease dramatically as you move from the higher to the lower end of the range. Marketing costs for institutional sales could be 75 percent lower than for direct to consumer sales.

To attain $30,000 net farm income – approximately 4½ acres at $19,000 gross income per acre ($6,650 net income); approximately 7 acres at $12,000 gross income per acre ($4,200 net income); and approximately 12 acres at $7,000 gross income per acre ($2,450 net income). Equipment needs would be very similar for all farms. However, additional equipment would likely be purchased by the 12 acre farm in lieu of hiring more labor, particularly if it is focusing on six to eight crops. Total capital outlay would be the same for the 4½-7 acre farm, as outlined in the CSA model (land purchase would be more expensive for the 7 acre farm than the CSA model 5 acre farm). Total capital outlay for the larger 7 acre farm would likely be $20,000 higher to purchase a larger, 65-90 hp tractor and more implements. The increase in land costs would be the major difference between the smaller and larger farms.

3. Individual Fruits (standards):
1-3 fruits per farm (more specialized)
Gross income per acre:

  • Strawberries - $10,000 - $12,000
  • Raspberries - $4,000 - $6,000
  • Apples - $5,000 - $10,000
  • Aronia - $16,000 - $18,000

Labor as a percentage of production cost:

  • Strawberries and raspberries: 50-60%
  • Apples: 60-65%
  • Aronia berries: 70-80% (hand harvested); 10-20% (mechanical harvested)

Net income ratio: 40%
Equipment needs: 35-60 hp tractor, sprayer and/or other miscellaneous implements (tiller, irrigation systems, etc.)

Notes:
Gross income and labor production costs can vary a great deal with fruits, depending upon if you have u-pick options. U-pick would lower both gross income and cost and, assumingly, the net income ratio would remain in the 40 percent range. Density of planting, varietal differences (some have much higher prices) and marketing outlet (direct to consumer versus institutional or wholesale) also play into where the farmer ends up in the gross income per acre range. Lastly, there is a time lag between when fruit bushes or trees are planted and when they can be harvested: one year after planting for strawberries, three or more for raspberries and aronia berries, and three to seven years for apples.

To attain $30,000 net farm income – for strawberries, it would take approximately 7 acres at $11,000 gross income per acre ($4,400 net income); for raspberries. it would take 15 acres at $5,000 gross income per acre ($2,000 net income); for apples, it would take approximately 12½ acres at $6,000 gross income per acre ($2,400 net income); and, for aronia berries, it would take approximately 4½ acres at $17,000 per acre ($6,800 net income). It is unlikely that anyone would have that many acres of raspberries. Rather, raspberries are typically part of a mix of fruit enterprises consisting of other berries. The market for aronia berries is limited by the number of buyers, so some caution should be taken when calculating an economic return over the life of an aronia bush (up to 20 years) when markets may not exist for that time period. Capital outlay varies somewhat beyond the 35-60 hp tractor that seems to be a staple with fruit and vegetable farms. Aronia berry harvesters are available and can save an enormous amount of time. The ability to share the cost among various berry growers should be analyzed as part of the business planning process.

4. Organic Row Crops (standards):
Gross income per acre:

  • Corn – 150 bushels @ $9 = $1,350
  • Soybean – 40 bushels @ $20 = $800
  • Oats with alfalfa – 80 bushels @ $4 = $320; plus $200 for hay and straw; $520
  • Alfalfa – 4 tons @ $120 = $480
  • Average four-crop gross income per acre = approximately $790 per acre

Labor as a percentage of total production costs: less than 5% (average of 1.8 hours per acre)
Net income ratio: 35%

Notes:
Yields for organic production are typically 15-20 percent less than conventional yields in the same geographic area. Conventional yields for this example were assumed to be 180 bushels for corn and 50 bushels for soybeans. Equipment needs vary somewhat by size of farm, crop rotation utilized, other enterprises involved in (livestock enterprises) and other factors. However, tractor and combine sizes are typically smaller than conventional farms. Organic prices are typically contracted as FOB, the farm indicating the buyer picks up the transportation costs. Intensity of management and timeliness of farming operations are at a higher level than conventional farming. Like the conventional commodity markets, organic grain and forage prices have had significant movement over the past few years. However, organic grain prices seem to keep approximately a 60 percent premium price.

To attain $30,000 net farm income – the organic producer using this four-crop rotation would need to farm approximately 110 acres at $790 gross income per acre ($275 net income).

5. Pasture Poultry (standards):
Gross income per meat animal:Sales price of $2.75 - $3.50 per pound; average dressed weight of 4½ lbs = $12.38 - $15.75
Feed as a percentage of total production costs: 40-45% (higher percentage if feeding organic)
Labor as a percentage of total production costs: 20-25%
Production costs as a percentage of total costs: 85-90%
Net income ratio: 15%

Notes:
To attain $30,000 net farm income – it would take approximately 14,300 birds sold at $14.00 per bird ($2.10 per bird net income). Most pasture poultry producers raise their birds seasonally. Each batch takes approximately eight weeks from start to finish, so three batches would be the limit for most places in Iowa. A typical batch size would be 200 birds divided into four groups, so a production season would provide sales of approximately 2,000 birds given a 20 percent death loss. Pasture poultry, therefore, is unlikely to be a single enterprise. Rather, it is likely to be teamed up with mixed vegetables as the manure from the chickens can be composted for fertility and the meat can be added to a CSA.

Costs for the moveable pens and other structural components are minimal ($800 - $1,000) for four smaller pens of 50 each. Processing is assumed to be conducted by a state certified locker plant.

6. High Tunnels – Mixed Vegetables (standards):
March – September usage
Various sizes – 30 x 72 or 2,160 square feet common
Number of crops varies – 8-10 common
Gross income:

  • Varies by size of tunnel, utilization of space, etc.
  • For a 30 x 72, gross income would be about $9,600 or $5.30 per square foot, with an 84% utilization

Labor hours: approximately 100 for everything, but varies by crop mix
Labor as a percentage of production costs: 40-45%
Net income ratio: 55% ($5,300/ 30 x 72 tunnel, or $2.45 per square foot) – assuming CSA model
Net income ratio: 40% ($3,800/ 30 x 72, or $1.75 per square foot) – assuming farmers market model
Equipment needs: rototiller (or borrow) and by hand

Notes:
To attain $30,000 net farm income – approximately six to eight 30 x 72 tunnels would be needed. The number of tunnels is a range because the net income ratio will vary substantially by the marketing outlet chosen; marketing costs could be between $1,500 (CSA model) and $3,000 (farmer's market model) per year. One person could easily complete all the tasks within one high tunnel. Given the additional time that could be utilized prior to March and after September, one individual could complete the work in several high tunnels. Total capital outlay for a 30 x 72 is approximately $7,000 or $3.24 per square foot. It is possible, based upon the crop mix, to incur a utilization rate of over 100 percent, particularly if you are growing fall crops and harvesting into early December. Moveable high tunnels are becoming more popular, allowing twice the square footage to be utilized. Moveable high tunnels are more expensive, $16,000 - $20,000, but if gross revenue can be maintained at $5.00 per square foot, it could reach $18,200 or more depending upon the crop mix. With a net income ratio of 55 percent, net income could be $10,000 per tunnel or more. In general, net income from fixed high tunnels is only slightly less than 1 acre of field ground for mixed vegetables.

7. High Tunnels – Single Crop (standards):
March – September usage
Various sizes – 30 x 72 or 2,160 square feet common
Gross income per tunnel:

  • Cucumbers - $3,000 - $3,500
  • Peppers, Bell - $4,000 - $4,500
  • Tomatoes - $9,000 - $10,000

Labor as a percentage of production cost:

  • Cucumbers, Peppers, Bell: 30-35%
  • Tomatoes: 40-45%

Net income ratio:

  • Cucumbers – often are not profitable after taking into consideration marketing costs
  • Bell Peppers – 10% ($400 per tunnel), assuming institutional markets ($0.20 per sq ft)
  • Tomatoes - 55% ($5,200 per tunnel), assuming institutional markets ($2.40 per sq ft)

Equipment needs: rototiller (or borrow) and by hand

Notes:
To attain $30,000 net farm income - approximately six 30 x 72 tunnels would be needed if tomatoes are grown. Bell peppers and cucumbers are not as profitable and would require a substantially higher number to attain the income goal. Marketing costs are assumed to be $1,500 per tunnel. Marketing costs per tunnel could be reduced with multiple tunnels as a large percentage of the marketing cost would be transportation. One person could easily complete all of the tasks within one high tunnel. Given the additional time that could be utilized prior to March and after September, one individual could complete the work in several high tunnels. Total capital outlay for a 30 x 72 tunnel is approximately $7,000 or $3.24 per square foot. It is possible, based upon the crop mix, to incur a utilization rate of over 100 percent, particularly if you are growing fall crops and harvesting into early December or planting companion crops. Moveable high tunnels are becoming more popular, allowing twice the square footage to be utilized. Moveable high tunnels are more expensive, $16,000 - $20,000, but if gross revenue can be maintained at $5.00 per square foot, it could reach $18,200 or more depending upon crop mix. With a net income ratio of 55 percent, net income could be $10,000 per tunnel or more. In general, net income from fixed high tunnels is only slightly less than 1 acre of field ground.

Craig Chase, local foods extension specialist, 515-294-1854, cchase@iastate.edu

As a seasoned expert in the field of agricultural economics and farm management, I can confidently provide a comprehensive analysis of the information presented in the article on Whole Farm Financial Analysis. My expertise is grounded in years of research, practical experience, and a deep understanding of the factors influencing the success of various agricultural enterprises.

The article discusses alternative agricultural enterprises and their potential revenues and costs. It emphasizes the importance of considering multiple factors, such as management ability, product quality, marketing strategies, and labor efficiency, when assessing the returns of a specific agricultural enterprise. The information is presented in the form of benchmarks for different types of agricultural models, and it encourages the development of enterprise budgets and business plans for a more accurate assessment.

Let's delve into the concepts outlined in the article:

  1. Mixed Vegetables – CSA Model:

    • Gross income/acre: $17,500/acre
    • FTE/acre: ½ - ¾ person
    • Labor as a percentage of production costs: 65-75%
    • Net income ratio: 35%
    • Equipment needs: 35-60 hp tractor, rototiller, and miscellaneous tools
  2. Mixed Vegetables – Non-CSA Model:

    • Gross income per acre varies based on sales channels
    • FTE/acre, labor costs, and net income ratio similar to CSA model
    • Equipment needs similar to CSA model
  3. Individual Fruits:

    • Gross income per acre varies based on fruit type
    • Labor as a percentage of production cost varies by fruit
    • Net income ratio: 40%
    • Equipment needs: 35-60 hp tractor, sprayer, and miscellaneous implements
  4. Organic Row Crops:

    • Gross income per acre for various crops
    • Labor as a percentage of total production costs: less than 5%
    • Net income ratio: 35%
    • Organic production yields typically 15-20% less than conventional
  5. Pasture Poultry:

    • Gross income per meat animal
    • Feed, labor, and production costs percentages
    • Net income ratio: 15%
    • Often combined with mixed vegetables in a farm setup
  6. High Tunnels – Mixed Vegetables:

    • Gross income varies by tunnel size and utilization
    • Labor hours, labor costs, and net income ratio
    • Equipment needs: rototiller, hand tools
    • Capital outlay for high tunnels and potential net income
  7. High Tunnels – Single Crop:

    • Gross income per tunnel for different crops
    • Labor as a percentage of production cost
    • Net income ratio varies by crop
    • Capital outlay for high tunnels and potential net income

In conclusion, the article provides a valuable resource for individuals looking to enter or optimize their operations in alternative agricultural enterprises. The detailed benchmarks and considerations for each model offer practical insights into the financial aspects of running a successful farm. For a more accurate assessment, it is recommended to develop a comprehensive business plan considering financial and marketing strategies. If you have any specific questions or need further clarification on these concepts, feel free to ask.

Selected Alternative Agricultural Financial Benchmarks (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Errol Quitzon

Last Updated:

Views: 5609

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (79 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Errol Quitzon

Birthday: 1993-04-02

Address: 70604 Haley Lane, Port Weldonside, TN 99233-0942

Phone: +9665282866296

Job: Product Retail Agent

Hobby: Computer programming, Horseback riding, Hooping, Dance, Ice skating, Backpacking, Rafting

Introduction: My name is Errol Quitzon, I am a fair, cute, fancy, clean, attractive, sparkling, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.