Proof of Work Vs. Proof of Stake - Scaling Parrots (2024)

Cryptocurrencies are the order of the day. However, not everyone knows the operation of the algorithms known as Proof of work and Proof of stake used in this medium of exchange.

They both are a consensus mechanism or algorithm which is used to validate transactions in the blockchain and add them to the blockchain to produce new blocks or tokens.

Proof of work is an indispensable security element today. And it is not only in the face of possible attacks on a network but also in the face of possible fraud within a cryptocurrency system. The objective of PoW is to create a consensus among all the parties that make up the network.

Proof of Stake is also a widely used consensus protocol or algorithm in blockchain technology which operates the same way as Proof of Work but has different features, which we will talk about in a short while. The acronym for the Proof of Stake is PoS, with which it is commonly known.

Thanks to these algorithms, which were developed to prevent mass spam and double-spending. Because of the PoW and PoS functions, their system has been implemented in various cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, which has popularized it.

The two most common and oldest consensus protocols cryptocurrency projects use are Proof of work and Proof of stake. The most heated debate in the crypto field is about which of these two consensus mechanisms is superior: Is it better to have Proof of work or Proof of stake?

The answer to this question is primarily determined by one’s opinions on a few topics. People who feel that global warming is the biggest threat to humanity may claim that excessive energy usage is just intolerable since it will result in the loss of life in the not-too-distant future.

On the other hand, countless people worldwide live in terrible conditions. They do not have the flexibility or financial means to change their circ*mstances. It might be claimed that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies significantly influence these people’s lives and would improve them.

Both options seem to provide enough security to run a blockchain and a cryptocurrency. There may also be other consensus algorithms, such as the Proof of participation, that offers faster transaction times than Proof of Work.

But regarding cryptocurrencies, the Proof of Stake and Proof of Work are the two major consensus algorithms used.

And in this article, we will compare the important features of the two consensus mechanisms. Let’s first look at PoW and PoS and how they work before understanding how PoS differs from PoW.

What Is Proof Of Work?

PoW is the oldest and most tested method of verifying transactions on the Blockchain, and the most popular cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, uses it.

To solve complex mathematical problems, PoW necessitates a large amount of computational resources. Proof of work is a form of decentralized consensus mechanism used in cryptocurrency mining. Bitcoin, the world’s first cryptocurrency, comes to mind as an example.

Proof-of-Work is a decentralized consensus mechanism that requires network members to use their resources to solve an arbitrary math problem that prevents others from playing with the system.

The network necessitates a large amount of processing power, which is why it is referred to as “proof of work.” Virtual miners all around the globe compete to solve a math challenge first to protect and validate proof-of-work blockchains.

The Proof of Work protocol helps us to avoid certain unwanted behaviors in a network. Its name comes from the English Proof of Work (PoW). This protocol works under the concept of requiring a job from the client, which is then verified by the network.

Usually, the requested work consists of performing complex computing operations. The network then verifies these operations. Once they are approved, the client is given access to use the resources of the client.

These operations help to prevent malicious clients from consuming all resources in an uncontrolled manner. A situation that may end up denying the service provided to the rest of the network’s clients.

A very simple example to understand this is the famous captcha put up when you want to register on a website. The web puts this challenge that the visitor has to solve. If you solve it, you will have access to the service.

This prevents an attacker from creating millions of records and thus crashes the web page. Just as the captcha in a website helps to prevent attackers from creating millions of records, so also does proof of work in a network.

Proof of Work Vs. Proof of Stake - Scaling Parrots (1)

How Does The PoW Protocol Work?

The Proof of Work works in a reasonably simple way. The process that takes place can be divided into the following major stages:

  • Stage 1: The client or node establishes a connection to the network. At this point, the network assigns you a computationally expensive task. This task must be solved in order to receive an economic incentive.
  • Stage 2: The puzzle resolution begins. This involves using a lot of computing power to solve the riddle delivered. This process is called mining.
  • Stage 3: Once the computational task is solved, the client shares it with the network for verification. At this point, it is quickly verified that the task meets the requirements. Doing so provides access to network resources. Otherwise, the access and the presented solution to the problem are rejected, and then the checks of protection against double spending are carried out.
  • Stage 4: After confirming that the task has been accomplished, the client accesses the network resources. Thanks to this, you receive a profit for the computational work performed.

These four stages allow and model the operation of the Proof of Work. The ease of this model will enable it to be transferred to different software to take advantage of its potential. But it is in blockchains where we observe greater utility, providing exceptional levels of security despite the low complexity of the protocol, which allows millions to participate concurrently in the network.

What Is Proof Of Stake?

Proof of the Stake (PoS) is a consensus algorithm for the blockchain network. Proof of Stake determines who validates the next block, and it uses computing power instead of decrypting cryptographic issues to verify transactions.

Peercoin is the first cryptocurrency to implement a comprehensive PoS consensus model. Proof of stake was introduced in 2011. Significant energy consumption is needed to expand on the PoS consensus in Bitcoin.

PoS is preferred by many new blockchains because it consumes significantly less energy than PoW. And that is why Ethereum, the second largest blockchain, switched from PoW to PoS on September 15, 2022, thereby reducing its energy use by 99.95%.

The technique behind Proof of stake is that if stakeholders have large amounts of cryptocurrencies, they will do nothing to harm the network. They, therefore, rely on owning a verifier node, with which transactions are validated on the network.

Proof of stake was created as a substitute for Proof of work, which is costly owing to the energy requirements. To Validate nodes, on the other hand, can be as basic as personal computers, requiring no more power than any other computer.

How Proof Of Stake Works

Proof-of-Stake reached consensus by asking users to contribute a portion of their tokens to be selected to validate transaction blocks and rewarded for it. The first factor to be considered in this selection process is the user’s commitment. In PoS, blocks are “forged” instead of mined.

Staking in the “Proof of Stake” means a certain amount in the network is locked as their bet. Use it as collateral to prove the block. Any person who wants to participate in the process must own a share in the network.

The more users bet, the greater their chances of being selected. The number of bets determines the probability that the node will be chosen as the validator to forge the next block. The more significant the stake, the greater the chance of staking compared to the bet.

In PoS, encouraging participation in authenticating reward blocks is a payment in the form of transaction fees. Unlike the newly created currency in PoW systems.

To avoid thinking that this is an opportunity for the rich node in the network. More and more unique methods are being added to the selection process. The key here is to include a level of opportunity for the selection process to avoid the richest user being chosen to validate transactions, earn rewards, and get richer.

The two most commonly used methods are Random Block Selection and Choose Age Coin.

  1. Random Block Selection: This is where the validator is selected by searching for nodes with the lowest hash value associated with the largest bet.
  2. Choose Age Coin: Nodes are chosen based on the time their tokens have been held as shares. The coins’ age is estimated by multiplying the number of days the coins are held as shares by the number of coins.

Similarities Between Proof Of Work And Proof Of Stake

  1. They both are a consensus mechanism for solving problems in the Blockchain of cryptocurrencies.
  2. Before any decisions are made, members have to come to an agreement on it before it is carried out.
  3. Before proposing a new block, there needs to be Proof that they’ve done some work by both the miners in PoW and validators in PoS.
  4. For Hackers to get access to all cryptocurrencies in the network, they would need to have 51% of the computing power to add a malicious block which is virtually impossible.

Differences Between Proof Of Work And Proof Of Stake

  1. Transactions on the Proof of Work network take longer to process. This is known as block time, and it varies with each project. The typical block duration for Bitcoin is roughly 10 minutes, although projects like Litecoin broadcast a new block every 2.5 minutes. Proof of stake Cryptocurrencies usually process transactions faster, and some transactions take only a few seconds to finalize. In addition, network configuration allows transactions to be transmitted very quickly, allowing validators to be validated much faster.
  2. In Proof of work, the probability of mining blocks is determined by how much of a computational work is done by the miner. In contrast, for Proof of stake, The size of a person’s bet (how many coins they hold) is determined by validating a new block.
  3. In Proof of Work, A reward is given first to the miner who solve the cryptographic puzzle of each block, while for Proof of Stake, the validator does not receive a block reward, instead collecting a network fee as a reward.
  4. In Proof of Work, to add each block to the network, miners must compete using their computer processing power to solve complex puzzles. In contrast, there is no competition in Proof of Stake since an algorithm selects the block maker depending on the user’s bet.
  5. Proof of Work expends a lot of energy and computing power to complete transactions, increasing transaction time. Proof of Stake uses less energy and shortens the consensus time.
  6. Bitcoin is the best-known encryption with a Proof-of-Work consensus-building algorithm that uses the best-known proof-of-work function called SHA256. Others include Ethereum (although in the future, with the update to Ethereum 2.0, it will use a Proof of Stake mechanism), Bitcoin Cash, Monero, Litecoin, and Dogecoin. In contrast, cryptocurrencies that use the Proof of stake include EOS (EOS), Tezos (XTZ), Cardano (ADA), Cosmos (ATOM), and Tron (TRX).
Proof of Work Vs. Proof of Stake - Scaling Parrots (2)

Conclusion

Consensus algorithms help Blockchain protocols to reach an agreement between a distributed network. Among those consensus algorithms are two main philosophies: Proof of Stake and Proof of Work.

The Proof of Stake determines the consensus based on the commitment of each user in the network.

In Proof of Work, miners compete for transactions on the network by solving complex mathematical problems, and as a result, they are rewarded with coins.

The biggest problem with PoS is that its security and fault tolerance have not been strictly mathematically demonstrated.

While the bitcoin business is constantly evolving, Proof of Work and Proof of Stake remain the two most often employed techniques. Understanding how they work is critical for gaining insight into how the blockchain works.

While the PoS process consumes significantly less energy than PoW, it’s crucial to realize that there are other factors to consider, such as how secure a blockchain is. PoW is regarded as more secure since it is the oldest and most well-proven validation mechanism.

As the bitcoin ecosystem expands and matures, blockchains that can achieve a high level of security while still being energy efficient will find themselves in a winning position in the near future.

See you soon,

Scaling Parrots

Proof of Work Vs. Proof of Stake - Scaling Parrots (2024)

FAQs

Proof of Work Vs. Proof of Stake - Scaling Parrots? ›

Proof-of-stake encrypts bitcoin to safeguard the network. It uses less electricity than Bitcoin's proof-of-work process. Proof of Stake (PoS) is a consensus protocol

consensus protocol
The consensus problem is a fundamental problem in controlling multi-agent systems. One approach to generating consensus is for all processes (agents) to agree on a majority value. In this context, a majority requires at least one more than half of the available votes (where each process is given a vote).
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Consensus_(computer_science)
created to replace the well-known Proof of Work, providing better security and scalability to the networks that implement it.

Is proof of stake more scalable than proof of work? ›

Proof of stake is classed as a more scalable consensus mechanism than proof of work, which is why the former in particular is also used for smart contract platforms, which have to process a high quantity of transactions.

Which one is better, proof of work or proof of stake? ›

Energy consumption

One of the biggest differences between proof of stake and proof of work is the amount of electricity used. A big complaint from cryptocurrency critics is the electricity use. Proof of work uses significantly more energy because of its authentication model that uses high-powered computers.

Is PoA better than PoS? ›

PoA, with its limited number of trusted validators, can handle a higher transaction throughput compared to PoS. However, PoS has the potential for higher scalability as it doesn't require a central authority to validate transactions.

What are the disadvantages of proof of work? ›

Advantages and disadvantages of proof of work
ProsCons
High level of security.Inefficient with slow transaction speeds and expensive fees.
Provides a decentralized method of verifying transactions.High energy usage.
Allows miners to earn crypto rewards.Mining often requires expensive equipment.

Why is proof of work not scalable? ›

Proof-of-work has mathematical limits on scalability that are substantially lower than hardware limits. Specifically, the combination of block frequency and block size must be bounded to maintain security. This bounds throughput to low hundreds of TPS, far below requirements for many practical applications.

How much more efficient is proof of stake? ›

Proof of stake is faster, sidesteps the energy burn, and requires no special computing equipment. For these reasons and others, it's the validation protocol for newer waves of cryptocurrencies and altcoins. For example, Ethereum 1.0 uses proof of work, but Ethereum 2.0 uses proof of stake.

What is one disadvantage of proof of stake? ›

Proof of Stake Drawbacks

Susceptibility to attacks decreases the overall security of the blockchain. Validators who hold large amounts of a blockchain's token or cryptocurrency may have an outsized amount of influence on a proof of stake system.

Why is proof-of-work slow? ›

One reason for the use of proof-of-work is to slow things down, so that block generation occurs at a manageable pace. PoW presents problems that only miners (computers) can solve roughly every 10 minutes. Thus, valid blocks come in relatively slowly.

What is the strongest POA? ›

The durable power of attorney

In other words, you'd use a durable POA if you wanted to give your agent authority once you're unable to act for yourself. Because of this, many consider a durable POA to be the most powerful type of power of attorney.

Which POA is the best? ›

For most people, the best option is to have a general durable power of attorney because it gives your agent broad powers that will remain in effect if you lose the ability to handle your own finances.

Is PoS or PoW more secure? ›

Security is one of the most important features of a blockchain network, as it ensures that transactions are valid and irreversible. Both PoW and PoS provide a high level of security, but they also have some vulnerabilities. PoW is more secure than PoS in terms of preventing 51% of attacks.

Is proof of work outdated? ›

While some view this as outdated, proof of work might not be as disadvantageous as commonly perceived. In fact, there are compelling reasons to believe it's both secure and environmentally beneficial in the long run.

Why is proof of work the best? ›

Proof of work allows for secure peer-to-peer transaction processing without needing a trusted third party. Proof of work at scale requires vast amounts of energy, which only increases as more miners join the network.

What problem does proof of work solve? ›

Nakamoto's consensus mechanism solved the double-spend problem. By incentivizing miners to verify the integrity of new crypto transactions before adding them to the distributed ledger that is blockchain, proof of work helps prevent double spending.

Why proof of stake is less secure than proof of work? ›

Security is less reliable.

Attacking the network is less viable due to the two-fold security mechanism of initial equipment expenses and continuous energy costs. Proof-of-stake systems require only a small initial investment to participate, making them more vulnerable to attack.

Is proof of stake less riskier compared to proof of work? ›

Proof of Stake is better than Proof of Work in the sense that it is much more energy efficient and validators do not require as intense a method before adding a block into the network.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 5584

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.