Four Pillars of Assessment: Validity (2024)

This blog post was first published as a guest post on The Association of School and College Leaders’ (ASCL) website. The blog series explores the four pillars of great assessment:purpose, validity, reliability and value.

There is no such thing as a valid assessment!

Validity is perhaps the most commonly-used word in discussions about the quality of any assessment. While it’s used a lot, it is often misunderstood and can be very misleading.

Validity is a word which, in assessment, refers to two things:

  • The ability of the assessment to test what it intends to measure;
  • The ability of the assessment to provide information which is both valuable and appropriate for the intended purpose.

A common misconception about validity is that it is a property of an assessment, but in reality, there is no such thing as ‘a valid assessment’. However, there is such a thing as ‘an assessment which is valid for a specific purpose’: validity is all about the inferences you make based on the information generated.

Two key questions

Researchers such as Samuel Messick (1989) have suggested there are two key questions to be asked of any assessment:

  1. The scientific question (technical accuracy): Is the test any good as a measure of the big idea, characteristic, or attribute it purports to assess?
  2. The ethical question (social value): Should the test be used for its present purpose?

In many cases, there are two reasons that assessments end up not quite hitting their target: construct under-representation and construct-irrelevant variance.

Construct under-representation: is where the assessment fails to capture important aspects of the construct (the target of the assessment). Examples include:

  • a German assessment of applying verb endings correctly which only tests the present tense;
  • a maths assessment of simplifying and manipulating algebraic expressions that does not test expanding products of two or more binomials.

Construct-irrelevant variance: the assessment outcomes are influenced by things other than just the construct. Examples include:

  • in the German assessment mentioned above, inaccessible vocabulary used in the questions affects the measurement of the intended construct;
  • in the maths assessment mentioned above, to answer a question the pupil is asked to first work out a percentage. Although a mathematical concept, we are no longer assessing just our intended topic (manipulating algebraic expressions).

When we talk of validity and great assessments, we are referring to the assessment’s ability to support the claims we want to make based on the information generated.

Improving validity

One of the key validity checks we can do when assessing the quality of an assessment is to consider: is there either construct under-representation or construct-irrelevant variance in this assessment? Defining the construct – saying what is and isn’t included in it – is a vital part of a robust assessment process. It is one way in which we can avoid construct under-representation and construct-irrelevant variance.

Ensuring that an appropriate and meaningful range of marks is used to represent performance at particular levels of achievement is another aspect of improving the validity of an assessment. If there are 50 marks available on an assessment task, but no student is awarded more than 35 marks or less than 20, is the assessment really out of 50?

Assessment validity is all about the inferences you make based on the information generated. Therefore, it is important to ask, does the assessment allow you to make inferences which are valid?

What’s next?

Validity and reliability form the foundation great assessment and should be considered side-by-side. In the next blog post in this series we will explore reliability and its relationship to validity.

***

“Understanding Validity” is one unit of learning from the Assessment Lead Programme. The programme is designed to offer a grounding to school teachers (primary and secondary) in assessment theory, design and analysis, along with practical tools, resources and support to help improve the quality and efficiency of assessment in your school.

Click here to find out more and register your school today.

assessment academy assessment CPD assessment lead programme evidence-based education four pillars of assessment professional development purpose training

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Four Pillars of Assessment: Validity (2024)

FAQs

What are the four pillars of assessment validity? ›

This blog post was first published as a guest post on The Association of School and College Leaders' (ASCL) website. The blog series explores the four pillars of great assessment: purpose, validity, reliability and value.

What are the 4 pillars of effective assessment? ›

In the same way, we can't develop great assessment practice without a strong base knowledge of the key theory around assessment. We have distilled this theory down into the four pillars of great assessment: purpose, validity, reliability and value.

What are the 4 pillars of formative assessment? ›

Effective assessments can be powerful tools for enhancing learning and raising attainment. To realise this, we must consciously plan assessments with purpose, reliability, validity and value in mind.

What are the 4 pillars of school based assessment? ›

The four pillars of great assessment are purpose, validity, reliability and value. In this article I will discuss them within the framework of a case study: the Y13 Maths Analysis & Approaches (AA) Standard Level (SL) mocks my students took at the end of January.

What are the 4 components of assessment? ›

There are four components of the assessment process. These include observation, written records, portfolios, and family information.

What are the 4 C's of assessment? ›

It focuses in particular on key soft skill competencies known as the “4Cs”: creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication.

What are the 4 principles of assessment? ›

There are four Principles of Assessment – Reliability, Fairness, Flexibility and Validity.

What is the four pillars model? ›

The Four Pillar Model is an evidence-based approach commonly used to guide federal and provincial planning, and addresses substance use across four principles: Harm Reduction, Prevention Treatment, and Enforcement.

What are the 4 pillars of education? ›

According to UNESCO's Learning: The Treasure within (1996), education throughout life is based on four pillars: learning to know, learning to do, learning to live together and learning to be. Learning to know, by combining a sufficiently broad genera!

What are the four 4 components of formative assessment explain each? ›

Elements of formative assessment. There are four core elements of formative assessment: 1) identifying the “gap,” 2) feedback, 3) student involvement, and 4) learning progressions. Teachers need to have a clear understanding of each of these elements.

What does incorporating the four pillars of assessment involve? ›

The four pillars of assessment include norm-referenced tests, interviews, observations, and informal assessment procedures (or, more generally, tests). An assessment that incorporates each of the four pillars is considered to be a good representation of an individual's unique profile (Sattler, 2001).

What are the four pillars of assessment model? ›

This blog post was first published as a guest post on The Association of School and College Leaders' (ASCL) website. It is the first in a series presented by Evidence Based Education which will explore the four pillars of assessment – purpose, validity, reliability and value.

What is the principle of validity in assessment? ›

Validity

A valid assessment assesses exactly what it claims to assess. You can make sure an assessment is valid by: ensuring that you cover all the performance criteria of the competency. collecting sufficient evidence over a period of time in a range of contexts.

What are the 4 ways to assess? ›

A Guide to Types of Assessment: Diagnostic, Formative, Interim, and Summative.

What are the four measures of validity? ›

Validity can be demonstrated by showing a clear relationship between the test and what it is meant to measure. This can be done by showing that a study has one (or more) of the four types of validity: content validity, criterion-related validity, construct validity, and/or face validity.

What is principle 4 validity? ›

Validity

Essentially, it means that the assessment process does what it claims, assesses the competency of the individual learner. In order for this process to be valid, the following is required: Assessments cover the broad range of skills and knowledge required for competent performance.

What is the 4 pillars policy? ›

Four Pillars Policy – An Australian Government policy that there should be no fewer than four major banks to maintain appropriate levels of competition in the banking sector.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Stevie Stamm

Last Updated:

Views: 6091

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Stevie Stamm

Birthday: 1996-06-22

Address: Apt. 419 4200 Sipes Estate, East Delmerview, WY 05617

Phone: +342332224300

Job: Future Advertising Analyst

Hobby: Leather crafting, Puzzles, Leather crafting, scrapbook, Urban exploration, Cabaret, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is Stevie Stamm, I am a colorful, sparkling, splendid, vast, open, hilarious, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.