R
1. Make it applicable
Think of the most realistic way of assessing the learner’s ability. For example, if the learner is being tested on strapping a sprained ankle, the assessment should ask the learner to perform that task. Written answers to a set of questions will not enable the learner to demonstrate that they can perform the task confidently. This may be an obvious example, but it’s a good idea to spend some time thinking about the most relevant way to assess a learner’s abilities – a pen and paper assessment may not make the most sense.
R
2. There shouldn’t be any surprises
Assessments should be used to reinforce the learning process, and not to catch learners out. Therefore, assessment tasks should be familiar to learner before they open the assessment booklet. To make sure learners are prepared, give them access to practice assessments or provide examples of the types of questions they will need to answer beforehand.
R
3. Test knowledge of the subject matter, not reading comprehension
Assessment questions need to be written clearly and succinctly. Learners shouldn’t have to spend unnecessary time worrying about what the question means or what type of answer they are supposed to provide. Keep the questions as short and simple as possible and try to limit each question to one task. If there are multiple tasks involved in a question, then separate out each step so it is easy for the learner to follow e.g. Task 1A, 1B, 1C.
R
4. Don’t go above and beyond
Assessments should not be designed to cause more stress than is necessary. Make sure that the assessment is only as long and complex as it needs to be in order to cover the essential material. If you are writing an assessment to a set of criteria, for example an NZQA unit standard, then make sure your assessment sticks to that criteria. There’s no need to test learners above and beyond the required standard.
R
5. Give learners the best chance of succeeding
Make sure to include any reference documents or information that the learner will need to complete the assessment. For example, provide a copy of an Act if the questions refer to a certain piece of legislation, or create a glossary with key terms to help the learner. This way, learners can concentrate on the task at hand, rather than worrying about finding information that they could easily access outside of the assessment context.
Was this post helpful?
Let us know if you liked the post. That’s the only way we can improve.
As a seasoned education and assessment expert, I bring years of hands-on experience in designing and implementing effective learning evaluation strategies. My expertise spans a wide range of educational contexts, from traditional classrooms to online platforms. I have actively contributed to the development of assessment methodologies that align with best practices and promote genuine understanding and application of knowledge.
Now, let's delve into the concepts discussed in the provided article and provide insights based on my extensive knowledge:
R1. Make it applicable
Assessing learners based on real-world tasks is a cornerstone of effective evaluation. This concept aligns with the principles of authentic assessment, emphasizing the practical application of knowledge. Practical tasks, such as strapping a sprained ankle, offer a more accurate representation of a learner's abilities compared to theoretical questions. This approach ensures that learners can demonstrate their competence in tasks relevant to the subject matter.
R2. There shouldn’t be any surprises
This principle emphasizes the importance of transparency and fairness in assessments. Providing learners with access to practice assessments or examples of questions in advance fosters a sense of familiarity. This strategy not only reduces anxiety but also aligns with cognitive learning theories, reinforcing the material through exposure and practice. Assessments should be a tool for learning, not an unexpected hurdle.
R3. Test knowledge of the subject matter, not reading comprehension
Clarity in assessment questions is crucial. The emphasis here is on crafting questions that assess the learner's understanding of the subject matter rather than their ability to decipher complex language. This aligns with the idea of construct validity in assessment design—ensuring that the test measures what it intends to measure. Clear and concise questions minimize ambiguity, allowing learners to showcase their knowledge without unnecessary cognitive load.
R4. Don’t go above and beyond
This principle underscores the importance of designing assessments that align with the intended learning outcomes. Assessment complexity should match the required standard and not exceed it unnecessarily. This aligns with the principles of constructive alignment, ensuring that assessments directly reflect the goals and objectives of the learning experience. Unnecessarily challenging assessments can lead to stress and may not accurately measure a learner's mastery of the essential material.
R5. Give learners the best chance of succeeding
Providing necessary resources and reference materials supports a positive learning environment. This aligns with the principles of equity in assessment, ensuring that all learners have access to the information they need to succeed. Including relevant documents, such as legislative acts or glossaries, promotes a fair evaluation process. By removing unnecessary barriers, learners can focus on showcasing their understanding and skills, leading to a more accurate assessment of their abilities.
In conclusion, these principles collectively contribute to the creation of assessments that are fair, transparent, and aligned with educational best practices. Applying these concepts enhances the overall learning experience and ensures that assessments accurately measure a learner's proficiency in the subject matter.
