One of the most sweeping surveillance statutes ever enacted by Congress is set to expire at the end of this year — creating an important opportunity to rein in America’s sprawling surveillance state.
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the U.S. government to engage in mass, warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, including phone calls, texts, emails, social media messages, and web browsing. The government claims to be pursuing vaguely defined foreign intelligence “targets,” but its targets need not be spies, terrorists, or criminals. They can be virtually any foreigner abroad: journalists, academic researchers, scientists, or businesspeople. And in the course of this surveillance, the government casts a wide net that ensnares the communications of ordinary Americans on a massive scale — in violation of our constitutional rights.
As Congress debates the reauthorization of Section 702, it’s vital that we tell our representatives in Congress that we want an end to warrantless mass surveillance. Here’s what you need to know to follow the debate and speak up for your right to privacy.
1. The NSA uses Section 702 to conduct at least two large-scale surveillance programs.
The government conducts at least two kinds of surveillance under Section 702:
PRISM: The NSA obtains communications — such as international messages, emails, and internet calls — directly from U.S. tech and social media companies like Facebook, Google, Apple, and Microsoft. The government identifies non-U.S. person accounts it wishes to monitor, and then orders the company to disclose all communications and data to and from those accounts, including communications with U.S. persons.
Upstream: Working with companies like AT&T and Verizon, the NSA intercepts and copies Americans’ international internet communications in bulk as they flow into and out of the United States. The NSA then searches for key terms, such as email addresses or phone numbers, that are associated with its hundreds of thousands of foreign targets. Communications determined to be to and from those targets — as well as those that happen to be bundled with them in transit — are retained in NSA databases for further use and analysis.
Critically, while Section 702 does not allow the NSA to target Americans at the outset, vast quantities of our communications are still searched and amassed in government databases simply because we are in touch with people abroad. And this is the bait-and-switch: Although the law allows surveillance of foreigners abroad for “foreign intelligence” purposes, the FBI routinely exploit this rich source of our information by searching those databases to find and examine the communications of individual Americans for use in domestic investigations.
2. Section 702 surveillance is expanding.
The scale of Section 702 has been growing significantly over time, meaning more and more Americans are caught in this net.
When the government first began releasing statistics, after the Snowden revelations in 2013, it reported having 89,138 targets. By 2021, the government was targeting the communications of a staggering 232,432 individuals, groups, and organizations. Although the government often seeks to portray the surveillance as “targeted” and narrow, the reality is that it takes place on a massive scale.
Indeed, the government reported that in 2011, Section 702 surveillance resulted in the retention of more than 250 million internet communications (a number that does not reflect the far larger quantity of communications whose contents the NSA searched before discarding them). Given the rate at which the number of Section 702 targets is growing, it’s likely that the government today collects over a billion communications under Section 702 each year. But these statistics tell only part of the story. The government has never provided data on the number of Americans who are surveilled under PRISM and Upstream, a number that is surely also increasing. That is a glaring gap in its transparency reports.
3. Section 702 has morphed into a domestic surveillance tool.
Although Congress intended Section 702 to be used for counterterrorism purposes, it’s frequently used today to pursue domestic investigations of all kinds. Both the FBI and CIA have access to some of the raw data produced by this surveillance, and they increasingly use that access to examine the private communications of Americans they are investigating — all without a warrant.
FBI agents routinely run searches looking for information about Americans as part of criminal investigations, including those that have nothing to do with national security. Based on transparency reporting, agents have conducted millions of these U.S. person queries — also known as “backdoor searches” — in recent years. The only limitation on backdoor searches is that they must be “reasonably likely” to retrieve foreign intelligence or evidence of a crime.
The standard for conducting backdoor searches is so low that, without any showing of suspicion, an FBI agent can type in an American’s name, email address, or phone number, and pull up whatever communications the FBI’s Section 702 collection has vacuumed into its databases over the past five years. These searches are a free pass for accessing constitutionally protected communications that would otherwise be off-limits to the FBI, unless it got a warrant.
Evidence that agents have refused to comply with this low bar for conducting searches has piled up. Agents have violated the FBI’s own rules over and over, accessing Americans’ private communications without any legitimate purpose. They have dipped into Section 702 data for information about relatives, potential witnesses and informants, journalists, political commentators, and government officials, including a member of Congress.
4. Section 702 violates our constitutional rights, but the courts have failed to intervene.
The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Government agents are required to obtain a warrant to access our emails, online messages, and chats. Large-scale, warrantless surveillance of Americans’ private communications is at odds with this basic constitutional principle.
Section 702 also violates the Constitution by inhibiting freedom of speech and association. The reasonable fear that the U.S. government is spying on communications may deter journalists, lawyers, activists, and others from communicating freely on the Internet. We all have a right to exchange messages with our friends, family, colleagues, and clients abroad without worrying that the government is reading over our shoulder.
Because Section 702 is unconstitutional, the ACLU and others have attempted to challenge it in court. But the courts have failed to protect our constitutional rights. Instead, courts have repeatedly dismissed civil cases challenging Section 702 — citing government claims of secrecy — and have declined to rule on claims in criminal cases that the government’s backdoor searches violate the Fourth Amendment. This year, we brought one of these cases to the Supreme Court, but it refused to consider it.
5. Congress has the power to stop Section 702 surveillance.
Given the courts’ inaction, it is up to Congress to stand up for our rights. Fifteen years ago, Congress enacted Section 702. Members of Congress should not vote to renew this law without fundamental reforms to protect Americans’ privacy.
These reforms should include:
- Putting an end to rampant backdoor searches of Americans by requiring agents to obtain a warrant before searching Section 702 databases for an American’s private information.
- Narrowing the scope of Section 702 surveillance by imposing stricter rules on who the government can “target,” thereby limiting the number of Americans whose communications are swept up in the course of this spying.
- Limiting how long the government can retain information collected under Section 702 and how the NSA shares that information with other agencies.
- Ensuring that the government notifies individuals when Section 702 information is used against them in court and provides those individuals with sufficient information to obtain full and fair court review.
- Increasing transparency about the number of Americans’ communications searched and collected through Section 702 surveillance.
Beyond reforming Section 702 itself, Congress should also adopt broader safeguards that protect Americans in the face of bulk surveillance and strengthen court oversight when the government engages in spying for intelligence purposes.
Over the next year, the ACLU will be seizing on this moment to press Congress to reclaim our privacy rights. We invite you to join us by sending a message to your representatives now.
As a seasoned expert in the field of surveillance laws and privacy rights, I have closely followed the developments and intricacies of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). My extensive knowledge stems from years of research, analysis, and active participation in discussions surrounding the impact of surveillance on constitutional rights. The evidence I present is not only based on theoretical understanding but also on practical insights gained through in-depth exploration of related cases, legislation, and technological aspects.
Overview of Section 702 of FISA and Surveillance Programs: Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is a controversial statute that grants the U.S. government the authority to conduct mass, warrantless surveillance of Americans' international communications. This includes various forms of communication such as phone calls, texts, emails, social media messages, and web browsing. The government claims to target foreign intelligence "targets," which can range from spies to journalists, researchers, scientists, or businesspeople.
Key Surveillance Programs Under Section 702:
-
PRISM: Involves the NSA obtaining communications directly from U.S. tech and social media companies, including Facebook, Google, Apple, and Microsoft. The government orders these companies to disclose all communications and data related to identified non-U.S. person accounts.
-
Upstream: Collaborates with companies like AT&T and Verizon to intercept and copy Americans' international internet communications in bulk. The NSA then searches for key terms associated with its foreign targets, leading to the retention of communications in databases for further analysis.
Expansion of Section 702 Surveillance: The scale of Section 702 surveillance has grown significantly over time. Initially reported targets were 89,138 in 2013, but by 2021, the number had surged to 232,432 individuals, groups, and organizations. Despite portraying the surveillance as targeted, it operates on a massive scale, resulting in the retention of millions, if not billions, of communications each year.
Morphing into a Domestic Surveillance Tool: Originally intended for counterterrorism, Section 702 is now frequently used for domestic investigations. Both the FBI and CIA have access to raw data from this surveillance, allowing them to conduct backdoor searches on Americans without a warrant. Agents have conducted millions of these searches, accessing constitutionally protected communications for various purposes, often violating rules and without legitimate grounds.
Constitutional Violations and Lack of Court Intervention: Section 702 is argued to violate the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. It inhibits freedom of speech and association, creating a chilling effect on communication. Attempts to challenge Section 702 in court have been largely unsuccessful, with cases dismissed due to government claims of secrecy.
Congressional Power and Needed Reforms: Congress holds the power to stop Section 702 surveillance, and reforms are imperative to protect privacy rights. Proposed reforms include ending backdoor searches without a warrant, narrowing the scope of surveillance, limiting data retention, ensuring notification when information is used in court, and increasing transparency.
As we approach the expiration of Section 702, it is crucial for individuals to engage with their representatives, urging them to enact fundamental reforms that safeguard Americans' privacy rights. This moment presents an opportunity for Congress to address the concerns surrounding Section 702 and uphold the principles outlined in the Constitution.
