Charters Yield More Learning, Higher Earnings than District Schools Per $1 Spent (2024)

Help fund stories like this. Donate now!

Public schools are about to face a heap of fiscal challenges. With billions of dollars of federal COVID relief about to run out, student enrollment dropping and pension obligations skyrocketing, there are tough choices ahead for districts.

But for certain public schools, funding challenges are nothing new. For the last two decades, our research team at the University of Arkansas has been studying charter school funding in major cities across the country. Over the summer, we released a report that found that across 18 cities in 16 states, charter schools receive, on average, 29.5% less funding — $7,147 less per student — than neighboring traditional public schools. This inequity is nothing new.

Our first report, which studied the 2002-03 school year, found a 27% funding gap. Since then, the gap has never been smaller than 20.7%, and it has on a number of occasions been higher than 30%. In other words, students who decide to attend a charter school in one of those cities will, on average, typically sacrifice nearly a third of their funding.

Of course, it’s not just about spending — ultimately, the goal is better outcomes for students. And so, for our newest report, our team combined funding research with data on student achievement so we could see what taxpayers are getting for their money.

The findings were clear: Public charter schools are a great investment. Across nine major cities — Camden, New Jersey; Denver; Houston; Indianapolis; Memphis; New Orleans; New York City; San Antonio, Texas; and Washington, D.C.. — we found that, despite persistent funding gaps, charter schools produced more learning and higher predicted lifetime earnings than traditional public schools per education dollar spent.

As education leaders make tough financial choices in the coming months, properly funding charter schools should be a no-brainer. After all, if they can achieve these results even with a yawning funding gap, imagine what they could do if they were funded equitably.

To obtain our findings, we matched our funding research with performance data from the National Assessment of Education Progress and research findings from the CREDO Institute at Stanford University. Notably, this methodology accounts for observable differences between the student populations of charter schools and traditional public schools, including prior academic achievement — and so it is truly an apples-to-apples comparison.

The results were striking.

In reading, charters average 4.4 NAEP points higher per $1,000 spent than traditional public schools, making charter schools 41% more cost-effective in reading.

 In math, charters average 4.7 points higher per $1,000 funded, making them 43% more cost-effective in math.

We also examined how attending a charter school instead of a traditional public school would affect lifetime earnings for students. To estimate this, we used wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics alongside the aforementioned CREDO study. And once again, charters came out on top. On average, each dollar invested in a student’s schooling in traditional public schools yields $3.94 in lifetime earnings. That same dollar invested in a charter school student yields $6.25 in lifetime earnings — a 58% higher return on investment over the course of a 13-year education.

What does this mean for education leaders? Despite the political noise, it’s clear that charter schools are a great use of public resources when it comes to what really matters: outcomes for students. As purse strings tighten, leaders should keep that in mind.

Successful businesses follow a simple practice: They direct more resources toward their more productive units. That’s not what is happening in public education these days. If charters were at least funded equitably, it’s easy to see how they could take their performance to another level, providing even better opportunities for their students.

After several years of mostly negative news coming out of public schools, education leaders should take advantage of this opportunity.

Help fund stories like this. Donate now!

Charters Yield More Learning, Higher Earnings than District Schools Per $1 Spent (2024)

FAQs

Charters Yield More Learning, Higher Earnings than District Schools Per $1 Spent? ›

On average, each dollar invested in a student's schooling in traditional public schools yields $3.94 in lifetime earnings. That same dollar invested in a charter school student yields $6.25 in lifetime earnings — a 58% higher return on investment over the course of a 13-year education.

Are charter schools more cost-effective? ›

Specifically, the researchers found “that charter schools demonstrate an approximately 40 percent higher level of cost-effectiveness than [traditional public schools] on average across nine cities.”

Are charter schools better in bringing education equity to urban areas? ›

While the merits of charter schools vs. traditional public schools are well-documented, some charter schools in urban areas can dramatically improve student achievement, especially among disadvantaged students, says a University of Michigan researcher.

What is the difference between a charter school and a public school in California? ›

A charter school is a public school that may provide instruction in any combination of grades (kindergarten through grade twelve). Parents, teachers, or community members may initiate a charter petition, which is typically presented to and approved by a local school district governing board.

What contributes to explaining the funding gap between charter and public schools? ›

State funding overall is the most equitable, and local funding is the least. Local funding disparities are not surprising given that many charter schools are their own school districts and have limited access to local tax dollars.

Why do charter schools perform better? ›

Because charters tend to serve far fewer students with disabilities and fewer who don't speak English as their first language, they can appear to be higher performing. Many charters do not “backfill” when students leave or take older students. Charter schools keep only the students they want.

What are the disadvantages of charter schools? ›

While public schools serve the local community by accepting all local students who enroll, charter schools are selective and only serve a small segment of students. They also tend to be more racially segregated than traditional public schools and often fail to serve students with special needs.

Are charter schools are beneficial to the quality of education in the United States? ›

Outperforming Traditional Public Schools

Stanford University's 2023 study found California's charter public schools are performing well, gaining the equivalent of 11 days of reading and 4 days of math compared to similar students in traditional public schools.

Are charter schools detrimental to public education in the United States? ›

However, the truth is that charter schools often siphon resources away from public schools and exacerbate existing inequalities. Charter schools have been known to be very selective with the students they enroll, leaving public schools to deal with the most disadvantaged students who require more resources and support.

Are charter schools public goods? ›

Charter schools are public schools that get funding from the state and have greater flexibility in hiring, curriculum, management and other aspects of their operations.

How are charter schools different from regular public schools in Quizlet? ›

Charter schools are also mandated by private agencies, while public schools are mandated by state curriculum.

How do magnet schools attempt to achieve high standards? ›

In magnet schools, curricular and instructional approaches should be theme and evidence based; interdisciplinary and dynamic; rigorous and relevant; and tailored to the needs, interests, and talents of the individual learners to ensure equitable academic success for all students.

Do Texas charter schools require certified teachers? ›

Teacher certification is required only if it is a special education or bilingual assignment, or it is stated in the charter application. There are 2 search options to find charter schools on the TEA website.

What is one factor that makes charter schools different from regular district schools? ›

Charter schools are exempt from many of the laws and regulations that apply to other public schools. They have greater autonomy in terms of curriculum, textbooks, instructional methods, and class schedules as well as financial decisions.

What is the reason for the spending gap between wealthy and poor school districts? ›

By relying largely on property taxes to fund schools, which can vary widely between wealthy and poor areas, districts create funding gaps from the word go. Affluent areas end up with well-funded schools and low-income areas end up with poorly funded schools.

How do charter schools increase segregation? ›

Though there isn't one direct reason why charter schools lead to increased segregation, individual charter schools have been found to use tactics such as marketing toward more affluent or whiter neighborhoods and using discipline policies to influence the makeup of the school's student body.

Are charter schools better than public schools in Florida? ›

Students attending charter schools are outperforming their peers in district-run schools. A Florida Department of Education annual charter school performance report (March 2019) shows that students in charter schools outperformed their peers in traditional schools in nearly every category.

How are charter schools funded in California? ›

In California, charter schools are funded through state aid and local funds, which have evolved to adapt to changing educational needs.

Do charter schools cost money in Texas? ›

Authorized by Texas in 1995, charter schools provide tuition- free public school options to students and families.

How do charter schools work in California? ›

Charter Schools are Public Schools

As part of California's public school system, charter schools are free and open to all students. Charter schools never charge tuition, do not earn profits, and do not have special entrance requirements.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jonah Leffler

Last Updated:

Views: 5646

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jonah Leffler

Birthday: 1997-10-27

Address: 8987 Kieth Ports, Luettgenland, CT 54657-9808

Phone: +2611128251586

Job: Mining Supervisor

Hobby: Worldbuilding, Electronics, Amateur radio, Skiing, Cycling, Jogging, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Jonah Leffler, I am a determined, faithful, outstanding, inexpensive, cheerful, determined, smiling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.