In the wake of Banko Brown’s fatal shooting by a security guard at a Downtown San Francisco Walgreens two weeks ago, security personnel at the drugstores have been directed to arm themselves with "nonlethal" guns that fire plastic pellets. The move appears to be an attempt at avoiding a similar tragic incident in the future.
However, the president of a security guard industry association said that the weapons are not sanctioned by the state for use by security guards, and the list of weapons the state allows licensed security guards to carry does not include this type of nonlethal gun. Meanwhile, San Francisco has a law on the books banning their use, though officials were unclear if it's being enforced.
Kingdom Group Protective Services, which provides security to about 20 Walgreens across the Bay Area, directed its guards to stop using regular guns on May 3—six days after one of its workers shot Brown. The company instructed guards to replace their guns with Byrna weapons, internal communications obtained by The Standard revealed.
“If necessary, use the less lethal weapons you are authorized and certified to carry. Acceptable tools are: ‘BYRNA,’ Pepper Gel, and ‘TASER,’” a May 3 Kingdom Group memo said.
The air-powered weapons, which are sometimes referred to as kinetic energy weapons or air launchers, look like regular firearms. They shoot large pellets and have been found in some cases to cause serious injury and—despite being billed as nonlethal—even death, according to the National Institutes of Health.
“I know people are carrying them, but you shouldn’t be carrying them,” David Chandler, president of the California Association of Licensed Security Agencies, Guards and Associates, said of the kinetic weapons.
Chandler said that security guards are neither trained nor licensed by the state to use such weapons.
When asked whether Byrna weapons can be used by security guards, a spokesman for the state’s Department of Consumer Affairs, which licenses security guards, replied with only a list of the weapons that guards are allowed to use. That list did not include Byrna guns, and the spokesman said that “current law does not address the use of kinetic weapons by security guards.”
Department spokesperson Peter Fournier said via email that if licensed security guards have the proper permits, they are allowed to carry firearms, batons, pepper spray and tasers.
When asked again if a kinetic weapon—specifically a Byrna—was barred from use, Fournier once more refused to address the use of a Byrna and replied that “kinetic weapon” was a broad term that may apply to numerous types of devices, so the state was unable to say whether security guards are explicitly barred from using them.
The spokesperson did say that any weapons “that can be perceived as a replica or simulated firearm are prohibited.” Aside from their bright colors, Byrnas look like real firearms. Chandler, of the industry association, said the Byrna "definitely looks like a firearm; I don't care what color you paint it.”
Chandler said that despite the state's waffling, the law is clear on who can use kinetic weapons and that security guards cannot use them. “The penal code says law enforcement only," he said. "Security guards are not law enforcement."
In San Francisco, there is similar murkiness around the legality of such weapons. While Police Municipal Code Section 602 bans them, whether the city enforces that law remains ambiguous. When asked, SF Police Department spokesman Adam Lobsinger wrote, “potentially” and advised reaching out to the District Attorney’s Office.
The District Attorney’s Office did not respond to a request for comment. The City Attorney’s Office confirmed that there is a law banning air guns and kinetic weapons on the books, but would not comment further.
The company that sells the weapons, Byrna, does not sell them in San Francisco, which it notes on its website. “None of the air launchers are allowed in San Francisco,” Byrna’s chief revenue officer, Luan Pham, said of their kinetic weapons.
Kingdom Group declined to comment on whether it had told guards to bring Byrna guns to Walgreens. However, Pham said that Kingdom Group told his company that Walgreens asked that the guards carry those weapons.
Walgreens denied that it had asked Kingdom Group to arm its security guards with Byrna weapons.
In addition to the internal communications advising personnel to use Byrna weapons, several guards The Standard spoke to said they are carrying them.
A Kingdom Group guard working at the Walgreens at Mission and 23rd Streets this week had a Byrna on his hip and acknowledged that he was ordered to use it instead of his gun.
Kingdom Group security guards are not the only ones carrying the weapons at Walgreens. Rafael Gutierrez, a security guard who works at two Walgreens in San Francisco for a security company named Security Special Services, said he is using a Byrna too.
“They shoot out hard projectiles and tear gas,” Gutierrez said of the weapon, which he ordered online and had sent to his sister's house in Richmond to get around the company’s refusal to ship them to San Francisco.
Security Special Services did not respond to requests for comment.
While Byrna vouches for the safety of its nonlethal weapons, the National Institutes of Health has said kinetic weapons have been found to be dangerous and can cause death when used in crowd-control situations.
On Byrna’s website, a number of reviews noted the guns' strength, even showing photos of the projectiles piercing particle board and a mannequin.
“After witnessing what the solid projectiles did to the piece of particle board i was using as a backstop??? You can officially label me a ‘byrna believer,’” wrote one reviewer.
Another review seemed to concur.
“I shot the Eco-Kinetic rounds into the back of my solid pine shed door: it looked like I had struck it five times with a ball peen hammer!”
As a seasoned security industry expert with an extensive background in the field, I can offer valuable insights into the complexities surrounding the recent directive for security personnel at Walgreens in Downtown San Francisco to equip themselves with "nonlethal" guns firing plastic pellets. My expertise spans various aspects, including the legal and regulatory framework, the specific weapons in question, and the potential implications for security guards and the public.
Firstly, the use of nonlethal weapons, such as those firing plastic pellets, is a response to the tragic shooting incident involving Banko Brown by a security guard at a Walgreens location. The decision to adopt these alternative weapons is likely motivated by a desire to prevent similar incidents in the future, promoting public safety.
However, challenges arise in the form of conflicting regulations and legal considerations. The president of a security guard industry association has pointed out that these nonlethal guns are not sanctioned by the state for use by security guards. The list of weapons approved for licensed security guards does not include this particular type of nonlethal gun, leading to a legal and regulatory gray area.
The Kingdom Group Protective Services, responsible for security at multiple Walgreens locations, has instructed its guards to replace regular guns with Byrna weapons, which are air-powered and shoot large pellets. These weapons, also known as kinetic energy weapons or air launchers, are designed to be less lethal but have been found in some cases to cause serious injury and even death, as noted by the National Institutes of Health.
The California Association of Licensed Security Agencies, Guards, and Associates president, David Chandler, emphasizes that security guards are neither trained nor licensed by the state to use such kinetic weapons. The state's Department of Consumer Affairs, responsible for licensing security guards, has not explicitly addressed the use of Byrna weapons, creating ambiguity around their legality.
The term "kinetic weapon" itself is broad and may apply to various devices, making it challenging for the state to provide a clear stance on whether security guards are explicitly barred from using them. However, the spokesperson did mention that any weapons perceived as a replica or simulated firearm are prohibited, raising concerns about Byrna weapons that closely resemble real firearms.
Local regulations in San Francisco add another layer of complexity. While there is a law banning air guns and kinetic weapons on the books, the enforcement of this law remains unclear. The ambiguity surrounding the legality of these weapons is further complicated by conflicting statements from different authorities, including the Police Department and the District Attorney’s Office.
Despite these legal and regulatory uncertainties, security personnel at Walgreens, particularly those employed by the Kingdom Group and Security Special Services, appear to be using Byrna weapons. This adoption raises questions about the company's compliance with local laws and regulations and the potential safety implications of deploying kinetic weapons in public spaces.
In conclusion, the use of nonlethal weapons in response to a tragic shooting incident has sparked a complex web of legal and regulatory challenges. The adoption of Byrna weapons by security guards at Walgreens highlights the need for clarity in state and local regulations, ensuring the responsible and lawful use of such weapons to safeguard both security personnel and the public.
