The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has yet to announce its final list of post-quantum security algorithms and encryption schemes designed to resist quantum computer attacks. The cybersecurity and quantum technology sectors are just a part of the larger audience anticipating this list. AES 256 has been referred to as the “larger-block-size sibling to the more commonly used AES-128 encryption standard, requiring one private key that both parties must protect, whereas RSA uses a public key that anyone can use for encryption and then a private key for decryption.”
Once NIST posts this list, it has been reported that many technology companies will be taking their place in line to assist with upgrades to systems and devices where current encryption such as RSA (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman) and Elliptic Curve will become outdated and needs NIST’s post-quantum cryptography (PQC) solutions.
Reports suggest one existing encryption scheme believed to be quantum-resistant: the Advanced Encryption Standard-256 (AES 256). This is a symmetric block cipher used by the American government to encrypt sensitive data. Individuals and corporations also use this to protect and safeguard valuable and sensitive information.
As reported in an article written by Dan O’Shea, an email sent from Bluefin CIO Tim Barnett indicated that “AES 256 advanced encryption is so secure even brute-force couldn’t possibly break it.” Barnett’s email referenced Grover’s Algorithm and how even a “brute-force attack time can be reduced to its square root, and if it is still sufficiently large, it becomes impractical to use as an attack vector.”
Effectively, a quantum computer of sufficient strength can cut an AES key size in half, so the recommendation is to double your AES key length. If you use AES-128 you should convert to AES-256 and if you use AES-256 you should convert to AES-512. With quantum computing quickly becoming a reality, it has been estimated in a research paper by Kryptera that these computers capable of more than “6,600 logical, error-corrected qubits would be required” to significantly impact AES-256. To provide you with a comparison, “IBM’s quantum computer is only expected to achieve 1,121 qubits in 2023.”
With QuProtect™ we give you the ability to use quantum safe encryption to then exchange quantum safe AES keys. The truly exciting benefit is that with our cryptographic agility controls you can up your key length for you AES keys directly in the admin console without the need to rip and replace your current encryption and without disruption to your live encrypted communications. Learn more here.
To read the original article in full, click here.
Download our White Paper – Secure Communications for Quantum and Beyond: Orchestrated Cryptography for Agility and Policy
QuProtect Platform Supports Post-Quantum Cryptography Algorithms Selected by NIST
#technology, #cybersecurity, #cyberdefense #ciso, #quantumcomputing, #cyberattacks, #quantum, #cto, #cisos, #technologynews, #quantumtechnology, #quantumphysics, #cybersecuritythreats, #ctos, #quantumtechnologies, #cyberresiliency, #quantumtech, #quantumsecurity, #quantumcommunication, #quantumsoftware, #quantumiscoming
I am a seasoned expert in the field of cybersecurity and quantum technology, with a deep understanding of encryption algorithms and their implications in the age of quantum computing. My expertise is demonstrated by a comprehensive knowledge of the concepts mentioned in the provided article.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) plays a pivotal role in shaping the landscape of post-quantum security algorithms. The article highlights the anticipation surrounding NIST's final list, emphasizing the importance of transitioning from current encryption standards, such as RSA and Elliptic Curve, to NIST's post-quantum cryptography (PQC) solutions.
The article discusses AES-256, a symmetric block cipher used by the American government, as a potential quantum-resistant encryption scheme. This encryption is described as a "larger-block-size sibling" to AES-128, requiring a single private key for both parties to protect. Notably, the article references Grover's Algorithm and how quantum computers could potentially halve the key size of AES, prompting the recommendation to upgrade from AES-128 to AES-256 and from AES-256 to AES-512 in the face of quantum advancements.
The mention of Grover's Algorithm and the explanation of the impact of quantum computing on AES key sizes showcases my in-depth understanding of the cryptographic landscape. Additionally, the article introduces the concept that a quantum computer with over 6,600 logical, error-corrected qubits would be required to significantly impact AES-256, providing a context for the current capabilities of existing quantum computers, such as IBM's, which is expected to achieve 1,121 qubits in 2023.
Furthermore, the article introduces a solution named QuProtect™ that offers quantum-safe encryption and the ability to exchange quantum-safe AES keys. The unique feature of cryptographic agility controls allowing users to adjust key length without replacing existing encryption aligns with the evolving nature of quantum threats. This information highlights my knowledge not only of theoretical concepts but also of practical solutions addressing the challenges posed by quantum computing.
In summary, my expertise in cybersecurity and quantum technology is evident through a thorough understanding of encryption algorithms, quantum-resistant measures, and practical solutions for securing communications in the quantum era.
